Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Poor Elect Democrats to Get Money From the Rich

  1. #1
    heydude
    Guest

    Poor Elect Democrats to Get Money From the Rich

    I read an editorial the other day in the paper and it makes me extremely mad. It was by a lawyer who was arguing that the poor are electing the democrats to tax the rich and give them their money.

    This makes me so mad I do not even know where to start.

    1. Some poor people vote for Republicans.
    2. Some rich people vote for Democrats.
    3. People vote for all sorts of reasons: religion, war, economic, terrorism, civil rights, etc. etc.
    4. What things are the poor getting from taxes the rich pay? I am thinking they mean food stamps or something? But do those extremely poor people even vote?
    5. The rich get many benefits from taxes including bailouts.
    6. Winners always give back to who voted for them. Bush repaid his friends. Obama has repaid me with a "making work pay credit" even though it was just a couple hundred bucks. Senators always fight for some pig project that benefits their district no matter how poor or how rich they are.

    I am thinking there are probably more poor or average people than there are rich people and that the author is saying this is unfair because they outnumber the rich and will therefore always be able to take the rich's money. But, money is power and money helps elect people, purchase senators, lobbyists, and air time, etc. ?

    Am I missing anything?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Veguita,NM center of known universe
    Posts
    43
    Nope you covered it pretty well except for #5, didn't include that the poor get many benefits from taxes, including the $400 making work pay credit. Sometimes i wonder about the age of information and how it effects those who form an opinion with small soundbyte sized info. But then again, political banter with has never been more fun.....

  3. #3
    Senior Member Zigzagman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    578
    Dan Quayle: “Not all of us can be born rich, handsome, and lucky, and that’s why we have a Democratic Party.”

    Are you missing anything? I think the biggest thing missing in Western society is that we seem to think in 5 second bursts. Nothing long term. We are all in a hurry to nowhere, seldom listen, and love to find opinions that agree with our point of view. In short, I think we have become almost a dysfunctional society.

    On a personal level - I am not concerned at all about how hard I work or am perceived to work. I think wealth distribution had always been a top down issue, and for the most part the American Dream is about keeping up with our peers. We can always be better or worse off but our social status sometimes in US of A is mostly determined by our sense of conformity.

    IMO, this is the downside of the conservative movement. It tends to limit creativity, group people, and defy logic in a million different ways.

    BTW - wealth has very little to do with political affiliation. We seem to like to be accepted and fit in and quickly embrace common values - unless you have the wealth to "go it alone".

    Where did all the hippies go? They were always outnumbered by the sh*t-kickers!

    Peace

    I like this definition of wealth - You are wealthy when more money won’t change where you live, what you eat, what you wear, what you drive or who you sleep with.

  4. #4
    Helper Gregg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Macondo (or is that my condo?)
    Posts
    4,015
    Quote Originally Posted by heydude View Post
    Am I missing anything?
    Only a breath or two. It's not really worth getting riled up over the opinion of some schmuck that felt the need to share his alternate version of reality through a letter to the editor, is it?

  5. #5
    Senior Member freein05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Calaveras Big Trees, California
    Posts
    705
    The poor are the least likely to vote in the first place so the article is way off base.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    9,665
    I think the biggest thing missing in Western society is that we seem to think in 5 second bursts. Nothing long term. We are all in a hurry to nowhere, seldom listen, and love to find opinions that agree with our point of view. In short, I think we have become almost a dysfunctional society.
    + 1

    On a personal level - I am not concerned at all about how hard I work or am perceived to work.
    honestly I would prefer to work as little as possible . But I have no actual way to live off government for the rest of my life without working (be realistic now, no existing programs would allow that without outright fraud. I'm not a criminal.), nor do I have enough money to do so otherwise either.

    I like this definition of wealth - You are wealthy when more money won’t change where you live, what you eat, what you wear, what you drive or who you sleep with.
    I'd probably buy a house for cash, rather than live in my rental, but I'd buy right around here mind you . The rest would not change.

    Only a breath or two. It's not really worth getting riled up over the opinion of some schmuck that felt the need to share his alternate version of reality through a letter to the editor, is it?
    + 1

    Some probably vote Democratic to maintain certain public spending, like welfare for a lifetime of not working, oh wait THAT DOESN'T EXIST. Like schools and so on. But frankly I think this is more the middle class than the really poor.
    Trees don't grow on money

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    717
    this is absolute nonsense.........we all vote for the person we thing will be best for our country as a whole. I do admit that as I get older, I really see the need for social security and medicare.

  8. #8
    Senior Member bae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Offshore
    Posts
    11,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Tenngal View Post
    this is absolute nonsense.........we all vote for the person we thing will be best for our country as a whole.
    I rather doubt that, looking at the history of districts re-electing the same representatives whose only accomplishment is to bring home the bacon to their district. Once some of these guys get their snouts into the trough, theer position is safer than if they were on the old-school Soviet Politburo.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Veguita,NM center of known universe
    Posts
    43
    Quote Originally Posted by Tenngal View Post
    this is absolute nonsense.........we all vote for the person we thing will be best for our country as a whole.
    No we do not get pick of the litter to vote for. who we vote for is the lesser evil, since our choices are who can raise the most money that become the final candidates.
    Think about it....... was GW Bush or Al Gore the best our political system had to offer in 2000 ?

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Veguita,NM center of known universe
    Posts
    43
    [QUOTE=Zigzagman;19305]Are you missing anything? I think the biggest thing missing in Western society is that we seem to think in 5 second bursts. Nothing long term. We are all in a hurry to nowhere, seldom listen, and love to find opinions that agree with our point of view. In short, I think we have become almost a dysfunctional society.
    Well said



    Where did all the hippies go? They were always outnumbered by the sh*t-kickers!
    We got 'em C'mon over, we'll have you talking spanglish in no time

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •