Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Possessing child pornography

  1. #1
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    25,476

    Possessing child pornography

    http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/c...bc7b427f3.html

    When I see news like this (Dean of Students at our promenent Univerity indicted for possessing child porn) a little niggling voice in my head has been telling me that we as a society have elevated child prnograpjy to a level of witch hunt.

    I know that children are highly harmed in the manufacture of this stuff. But what happens when graphic arts production tehnique becomes so sophsticated that live himans no longer exist in porn?

    Tell me that my little voice is wrong. Tell it to shut up. We are doing the right thing in society, yes?

  2. #2
    Senior Member bae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Offshore
    Posts
    11,484
    Did they bag this guy for possessing animated/CGI images, or real ones?

  3. #3
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    25,476
    Quote Originally Posted by bae View Post
    Did they bag this guy for possessing animated/CGI images, or real ones?
    I imagine his crime is for possessing real ones.

  4. #4
    Senior Member catherine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    14,681
    I just don't get how people feel safe using the internet for pornography at all, especially if they are in prominent positions and ESPECIALLY if they are in prominent positions and into child pornography. Are they stupid?
    "Do any human beings ever realize life while they live it--every, every minute?" Emily Webb, Our Town
    www.silententry.wordpress.com

  5. #5
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    25,476
    Quote Originally Posted by catherine View Post
    I just don't get how people feel safe using the internet for pornography at all, especially if they are in prominent positions and ESPECIALLY if they are in prominent positions and into child pornography. Are they stupid?
    I know, I dont get it etiher.

    And this thread is stupid, who started it, anyway? Haha. This guy did harm to society, children were hurt pretty severly to feed his hobby/compulsion/whatever you want to call it. The law needs to take him to task.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    4,793
    There is a famous case where the child harmed the industry; Traci Lords. She obtained false id, to get into the industry. Remember the Mrs. America scandal with Vanessa Williams? That issue of Penthouse, is illegal to sell with the center section intact, yet still sells on Ebay. (there is another issue Traci was in as well)
    There is also issues with having people who either look or dress young. (Cinderella, who also played in the film Boogie Nights, as an underage girl as one example)
    Point being, unless we are the Jury, we have no idea if he was obtaining it and looking at it for hours on end, or has a grandkid, who was looking at stuff, and he got the history from the kids computer and went to see what they were looking at. I have no idea, based on that article what he did, only what he is charged with. If it turned out that he was found not guilty, or even innocent, then what happens to his reputation?

  7. #7
    Senior Member Teacher Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    12,889
    You can also go to a porn site not knowing but I would think that you would need repeated offenses to be charged. For instance my friend wanted me to go to a Ranger Rick website which used to be a kids version of National Geographic. She wanted me to order it for her grand daughter. Well the name of the magazine has changed. When you go to that website you get a live feed of a couple having oral sex.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    upstate NY
    Posts
    2,758
    Quote Originally Posted by Teacher Terry View Post
    You can also go to a porn site not knowing but I would think that you would need repeated offenses to be charged. For instance my friend wanted me to go to a Ranger Rick website which used to be a kids version of National Geographic. She wanted me to order it for her grand daughter. Well the name of the magazine has changed. When you go to that website you get a live feed of a couple having oral sex.
    that's sick, we live in a crass society

  9. #9
    Senior Member Teacher Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    12,889
    I have read that other porn sites have common names like whitehouse.com. A government site would say .gov but many people don't know that.

  10. #10
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    25,476
    Quote Originally Posted by ToomuchStuff View Post
    There is a famous case where the child harmed the industry; Traci Lords. She obtained false id, to get into the industry. Remember the Mrs. America scandal with Vanessa Williams? That issue of Penthouse, is illegal to sell with the center section intact, yet still sells on Ebay. (there is another issue Traci was in as well)
    There is also issues with having people who either look or dress young. (Cinderella, who also played in the film Boogie Nights, as an underage girl as one example)
    Point being, unless we are the Jury, we have no idea if he was obtaining it and looking at it for hours on end, or has a grandkid, who was looking at stuff, and he got the history from the kids computer and went to see what they were looking at. I have no idea, based on that article what he did, only what he is charged with. If it turned out that he was found not guilty, or even innocent, then what happens to his reputation?
    Yes, the facts of this case can only be determined by the professional law enforcement people and his guilt determined in court. I hope there are mitigatng circumstances, but it isnt likely.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •