Is that really true, or is it just a dramatic pose people like to strike? The president isn't a king you must either swear fealty to or fight to strike down. You might agree with him on immigration but disagree with him on trade, for instance. Why does it need to be such a stark Manichean choice?
While it's true that trump is a big believer in grudges I doubt he'd veto a bill because some of the senators that voted for it called him out as a racist. And that seems to be about the extent of "having to work with trump." It's not as though trump has anything more than the most cursory knowledge or understanding of any of the policy issues that congress might consider, so it's not as though he can contribute anything more meaningful to the "doing business" thing than the scrawl of his signature on whatever bill congress produces.
A friend just posted on facebook something that seems to be the perfrct response. The protest is planned to be in the presodio because it's federal land and not subject to the city's more restrictive gun laws. The friend's idea is for everyone to go park in every soace in the presidio. The neonazi white nationalists then have the choice of parking in the city and breaking the city's gun laws or gojng home. No confrontation necessary. I'm sure my dad never thought his car would be used to protest white nationalists, but i cant think of a better use for a 15 year old honda...
The event in Boston yesterday largely went well. Other than a few yahoos who acted out afterwards, it was peaceful.
They did a great job of separating the rally attendees from the counter-protesters. Maybe too much so for the rally organizers, they terminated their event way before it was supposed to be over.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)