I won't be granting interviews; I'll leave that to Bannon and the like.
I admit Republican candidates have been scrupulous in pretending to care about the sensibilities of the "little people." as Leona Helmsley would characterize them. Trump, after all, famously exclaimed "I love the poorly educated!" which no doubt got him tons of votes. I suppose it's human nature--or the nature of some humans--to scorn the learned. Too bad, in a country where schools and libraries are free (so far).
I think it's the unfounded assumption of intelligence that gets feared and mocked. What is more frightening than a dangerous incompetent who demands your trust? What is sillier than being lectured to by an arrogant buffoon?
While I think voting for Trump was an example of cutting off one's nose to spite one's face, I can certainly understand the impulse of wanting to thumb one's nose at the pretensions of a self-styled elite.
They don't seem to differentiate between assumption of intelligence and actual intelligence. And becoming intelligent might help them learn how to tell apart the two. But I'm sure I'd get called an elitist snob for making that suggestion.
Electing the biggest buffoon of all doesn't seem like a sensible solution. Nad seems to show a lack of understanding that, for better or worse, the president makes life and death decisions on a daily basis. Picking someone with some sort of competence would seem to matter and anyone too stupid to recognize that is just a stupid idiot. But hey, if we get in a nuclear war with North Korea we'll undoubtedly blow them off the face of the planet many teams over. Those of us who survive can be all proud about how great he made America, chanting "USA! USA! USA!"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)