I think you're not being truthful in your description of this experiment. It seems to me that it's not sports fandom that you aspire to, but rather an evaluation of sports fans. I can see how that would put them off as it becomes apparent in your interactions with them.
"Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein
My thought is that you're exposing your true goal in becoming a sports fan for a year. It's not about watching perfectly-executed double plays or a wing faking out a goaltender one-on-one or finding a new hobby or even reliving the days when you played these sports. Even your posts here don't discuss a great play you saw or an insight into how the game is played; it's about the experience of being a fan and the trappings of the environment. It's about fandom itself. And I think your fan friends are picking that up.
Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as by the obstacles which he has overcome. - Booker T. Washington
You’re a fake convert to a religion you don’t believe in. That’s why they’re annoyed.
Well you do seem to go at it with more judgement than if you took up say swing dancing for a year and had never swing danced a minute in your life before (I don't know to see how good you could get, or just for something to do, to meet the ladies would be an ulterior motive but common). Is swing dancing irrational? Eh I suppose but dancing is pretty ancient in human activities. Is it a religion? Not generally.
Being a baseball fan well for many modern attention deficit sports fans baseball is slow so yea you learn it from your father etc.. What is faster? Well football is losing popularity now due to the violence and head injuries etc.. Ice hockey, basketball.
Trees don't grow on money
I am, by my very nature, a judgmental person. I did a learn to dance challenge back in 2015. I learned a whole bunch of fun party dances (The Steve Martin, The Freaky Deeky, Happy Feet, etc.). It was fun and I can still do a fair number of the moves!
Baseball is an interesting sport, the statistical likelihoods intrigue me. Like, how likely is a given batter to swing on the first pitch?
The CTE problem in football and, to a lesser extent, hockey is rather distasteful. Though I will deal with that cognitive dissonance when the time comes.
Haha! Could be you are right.
Or could be I was right.
You seem to be particularly bothered by my year of sports fandom...
You know, I don't hide that I am doing this experiment. I talk about it openly with friends and acquaintances. I thought about being stealthy, but that is not really my style.
Maybe my brain works differently than you all's but suppose some person said to me: "UL, I want to be an atheist for a year. Now, I have always been Christian and I will certainly still think some Christian thoughts and make some Christian judgments but I want to live as an atheist for a year -- talk about atheism, do atheist activities, read atheist books, and so on. Will you help me? Will you be my guide?"
I would be like: "Heck yeah!" I would gladly help this person and encourage them. If they said something judgmental I will talk it over with them. I'd encourage them to talk to more atheists, attend a convention, watch The Ledge, and so on.
If someone said to me: "I have never fished. But I want to do an experiment where I become an outdoorsy fisherman for a year."
I would again be like: "Heck yeah!"
Even if they said, "I think catching fish -- even for food -- is brutal and gutting fish is disgusting!" I would still be happy to show them the ropes, encourage them, and see what happens. Why?
Because you never know what might happen.
The Christian could become an atheist. Or at least learn that most atheists are really darned good folks.
Because that squeamish anti-fishing person could, over the course of the year, learn to love it. Or they could simply understand anglers better.
Who knows!?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)