Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42

Thread: It is virtuous if you're actually just inclined to that virtue?

  1. #11
    Senior Member catherine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    14,637
    Quote Originally Posted by Ultralight View Post
    You could pull a Daniel Suelo or Mark Boyle. You could self-style it.

    But it means accepting risk. Like you would not have health insurance or fridge full of food.
    That's what I was thinking. And Heidemarie Schwermer just died a short time ago, but she lived moneyless. It's doable. As UL said, the biggest barrier to living that life is refusing to abandon illusions of security.
    "Do any human beings ever realize life while they live it--every, every minute?" Emily Webb, Our Town
    www.silententry.wordpress.com

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    9,656
    I don't think those are very comparable to monasteries. Those are individual, a monastery was never just one person, it was a (religious) community. A commune would be closer. A few communes do still exist.
    Trees don't grow on money

  3. #13
    Senior Member SteveinMN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Saint Paul, Minnesota
    Posts
    6,618
    Quote Originally Posted by razz View Post
    Virtue is a whole different kettle of fish. My online dictionary defines virtue as "a quality considered morally good or desirable in a person: patience is a virtue." Virtue can be defined by a society or for oneself.
    My take on reading UL's question was that virtue is not defined by an individual; it is more of a societal or cultural consensus. And different societies and cultures may modify what is considered "virtuous". In some cultures, for example, individualism is a virtue; in others, acting for the collective good is a virtue. Neither can say the specified virtue is good or bad; it is good or bad only in the context of the rest of that people group. So I don't think being virtuous requires sacrifice. Some people are almost born to certain virtues. Others never achieve them (that doesn't necessarily make them unvirtuous either).
    Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as by the obstacles which he has overcome. - Booker T. Washington

  4. #14
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    25,383
    Quote Originally Posted by Ultralight View Post
    My premise is that simple living can be virtuous.
    What is virtuous about it?

  5. #15
    Senior Member Tradd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    The Suburban Midwest
    Posts
    7,429
    Is this The Brothers Karamazov by Dostoevsky?

    The Russians are really heavy to read. Which translation?

  6. #16
    Senior Member Ultralight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    10,216
    Quote Originally Posted by Tradd View Post
    Is this The Brothers Karamazov by Dostoevsky?

    The Russians are really heavy to read. Which translation?
    It is David James Duncan!

  7. #17
    Senior Member Ultralight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    10,216
    Quote Originally Posted by iris lilies View Post
    What is virtuous about it?
    I think it depends on why a person does it. That is the heart of this conversation.

  8. #18
    Senior Member catherine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    14,637
    Quote Originally Posted by Ultralight View Post
    I think it depends on why a person does it. That is the heart of this conversation.
    I think it's safe to say that many, many wisdom-seekers and sages have advocated a simple life, going way, way back to early civilization. A lot of "simple livers" are represented in various schools of philosophy, and tons of spiritual leaders (outside of Christian Evangelicals and advocates of the Prosperity Gospel) have spoken to the "virtues" of a life of simplicity. I could start a list of historical proponents of simple living as a virtue in and of itself, but I don't have time and it would be too long a post.

    So if simplicity is a virtue, what difference does it make when you get on the train? The "virtue" of taking up the simple life shouldn't be like a cross to bear, but in practicing a way to greater happiness.
    "Do any human beings ever realize life while they live it--every, every minute?" Emily Webb, Our Town
    www.silententry.wordpress.com

  9. #19
    Senior Member razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    8,169
    Who cares if one exhibits virtue? Who is judging? Who appointed the judge? Why? To what end for the individual?
    As Cicero said, “Gratitude is not only the greatest of virtues, but the parent of all the others.”

  10. #20
    Senior Member bae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Offshore
    Posts
    11,477
    Quote Originally Posted by ApatheticNoMore View Post
    I'd be like Peter if such a choice existed in the modern world. But it really doesn't. I do sometimes think about this, how there really aren't ways to live a monastic life in the modern world much.
    There are still monasteries out there. Until recently, there was a Benedictine and a Franciscan monastery just a few miles from me, on one of our smaller islands. The Franciscans (who used to run the ferry dock and the one-and-only store on that island) closed up shop just a few years ago, but the Benedictines are going strong.

    https://olrmonastery.org/

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •