Originally Posted by
Williamsmith
Isn’t it sad that women in the US have had the right to vote and run for public office for nearly a century and there is hardly any rememberence of one whom we can admire without thinking of other countries.
Manning was runner up for Marylands US Senate Primary Election for Democrats. That should qualify her as a politician. She was limited in her campaigning by nagging ill health.
Yes, very sad. I just pulled this quote from this article in The Nation:
America now ranks ninety-eighth in the world for percentage of women in its national legislature, down from 59th in 1998. That’s embarrassing: just behind Kenya and Indonesia, and barely ahead of the United Arab Emirates.
As for Chelsea Manning and Christine Hallquist (jp1, I don't think DH has formed an opinion yet.)--it's interesting that you guys have offered two transgendered females. I am not disputing that both are admirable--especially Chelsea Manning, but my question is, out of the short list of about a dozen women you guys have offered me, why are two transgendered? Is there something about their experience in a male body for many years that primed them for political leadership? Or is there some other reason?
And can we count as politicians on this very short list bae's & Garndr's choices of Supreme Court Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and Sonia Sotomayor? They didn't have to be elected, they were appointed, and their function is judicial, not legislative.