"Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein
Alan, I would respectfully state that people are merely reacting to one of the worst injustices that has occurred in regard to the proper administration of a capitalistic society. That is the bank bailout of 2008. For capitalism to work it must be accompanied by failure. Our own government provided the fuel by which this fire of resentment has been lit. Occupy Wall Street may not have all the theory straight but anger over the bailout is not one area they are wrong about.
Most People dont object to unequal distribution of wealth so long as it is merit based. Increasingly, our American brand of capitalism has been under scrutiny. Can you blame people for looking for unfair advantages after the very people who caused the Great Recession were bailed out?
All you are seeing is the continued grievances that were set in motion about ten years ago. And this tends to undermine the real market forces that can work but won’t when workers don’t trust the system.
How can we have any trust in a system that favors the wealthy and so publicly refuses to let them fail at the same rate any other participant in capitalism experiences.
And I would submit, in an equally respectful manner, that people are reacting to the misguided notion that it isn't fair for some to have much when others have little. As a result, they want the government to make things "fairer" for them, which isn't actually fair at all.
"Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein
What I’ve read here always seems to express a concern that the inequality is not the result of a merit based system. .thats different than saying it’s just not fair period. But I can see how it’s easier to be dogmatic about it if you can describe the opposition as fringe lunatics.
It is necessary for government to referee the game and access penalties for infractions.
Here is a discussion which will resonate with a certain group regarding American Capitalism on the brink of Collapse. The viewpoint is from the Professor of Economics Richard Wolff whose historical explanations and observations come from the Marxist Economic model.
Now, you may dismiss the discussion totally and choose not to listen but there are some ideas expressed which should be digested. Income inequality ....are capitalists starving out the poor in America. Have they reached their limits for borrowing? Has American capitalism cast aside its population in favor of selling goods to the world? Is there a connection in history to our current economy and the late 1920s?
Watch the ideas being expressed here and ponder the difference between politics and economics as they relate to democracy. Should we have democracy in economics that involves the workers also? Are corporations removing democracy from politics with their wealth, power and influence?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)