I hadn't realized it was Thomas Friedman that coined the term "Green New Deal" twelve years ago. Today, the NYT linked to the original op-ed piece where he outlined what he felt needs to be done--and like the current GND concept, it involves a systemic approach--no shorter showers by well-intentioned individuals, but strong government incentives such as the ones the GNDers are proposing.
And he points out:
High standards force innovation, and innovation leads to conservation at scale.
And here we are, 12 years later, still duffing around, still short-sightedly trying to ignore, deny, defend, and blame our way out of addressing this issue.
On a related note, I read yesterday that all the healthcare industry lobbyists are lining up ready to attack "Medicare for all." And what are they using as their best argument? "Obamacare is flawed, but it's working for most people so if it ain't broke, why fix it." All of a sudden Obamacare is their best friend.
The GND proposal is like Obamacare. No one expects it to be perfect but it's better than what we've got--which is an administration that is setting us back relentlessly in our previous efforts. I'm hoping that in 12, or 15, or 20 years when we are putting the final stake through the heart of the fossil fuel industry, that the energy lobbyists will be acknowledging our new, sound environmental policies to be as entrenched as Social Security and Obamacare are now.