I had a good laugh over the false statement that Biden and Trump were the same. They are polar opposites.
I had a good laugh over the false statement that Biden and Trump were the same. They are polar opposites.
I didn’t think Trump had much of a shot a month or two ago, but now I think the riots will help more than hurt him, and COVID seems to be receding somewhat in the national consciousness. He seemed to do his best as a backlash candidate, profiting from the resentment of the disdain of certain elites. If he can position himself as the anti-riot guy as opposed to the I-deplore-violence-but approach, and sell the argument that the violence is occurring in places traditionally controlled by Democrats, he may pull it off.
The Democrats have the more complicated tasks of convincing the public that the impact of the virus is largely due to Trump, and that his baleful influence has made the rioting worse. And they need to do it without insulting large segments of the population.
Neither the character issue and promise of vast new government benefits don’t yet seem to have made much of an impact. If that changes in the next few months I would think it will help the Democrats substantially.
I used to vote for random candidates with no chance of even registering, let alone winning. I no longer expect a candidate to be a paragon of perfection; I just want them to share my values as much as possible. Biden is a compromise, but Trump is unthinkable.
Every day... today's
President Donald Trump has directed the Office of Management and Budget to crack down on federal agencies' anti-racism training sessions, calling them "divisive, anti-American propaganda".
A Trump administration proposal released Friday would allow the government to deny habitat protections for endangered animals and plants in areas that would see greater economic benefits from being developed -- a change critics said could open lands to more energy development and other activities..... Other steps under Trump to scale back species rules included lifting blanket protections for animals newly listed as threatened, setting cost estimates for saving species and a pending proposal to restrict what areas fit under the definition of "habitat".
Polar opposites? True believers are going to truly believe, but that seems to be laying it on a bit thick even for these overheated times.
I think there are many similarities between these two. Both used privileged positions to avoid military service, and then spent the next few decades pretending to be tough guys. Both are prodigious liars and needlessly vindictive. Just ask Curtiss Dunn. Both have compiled impressive ick factors.
If the election comes down to character, I think both sides will have enough ammunition to waste the next couple of months annoying the voters with attack ads. I don’t think either side will be able to convince anyone except the zealots that this is a battle between good and evil. This is going to be more of a hold-your-nose election.
I had to look up Curtiss Dunn and found this article:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...es_142706.html
There has been apocalyptic language for years -- this is the most important election, the very nature of our government and our our freedom is at stake, etc. Remember the inaugural day protests when Bush got in office, which Michael Moore dramatized with dire warnings? And the country survived.
I don't thing the country can survive another 4 years of trump.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)