Or wait for Bolton to leak the next chapter of his book.Originally Posted by Alan
Or wait for Bolton to leak the next chapter of his book.
So apparently Marco Rubio thinks trump should be removed but admits he’s too spineless to actually do it. Perhaps Rubio should be removed and replaced by someone who isn’t so much of a coward.
That's a fun thought to entertain. Speculatively, if Trump wins the next election and the dems gain seats in the Senate, we could at least hear some of the covered up evidence and witnesses.
Does double jeopardy apply to articles of impeachment?
Jp, the whole thing is disgraceful.
I was thinking that surely they have a laundry list of other offenses, and they could just go with those.
Monica Lewinsky tweeted that she's willing to take one for the team by erm, performing fellatio on Trump, if her doing so would result in the Senate calling witnesses...I'm pretty sure that was a bluff...
ETA: Per Snopes, this was a fake tweet. I usually check there first, so mea culpa. I also should have known it wasn't Lewinsky's brand of humor, if she has one--sounds more like Chrissy Teigen to me.
Last edited by JaneV2.0; 2-9-20 at 11:50am.
CNN could start a new station that covers gavel-to-gavel Impeachment hearings 25/7. “All the impeachment all the time” could be a tagline.
Rather than pursuing the conspiracy of the month, I think the Democrats would be better served by winning elections. Trump and the GOP not necessarily in the best odor, there would seem to be opportunities there.
There are definitely opportunities. Assuming the republicans don’t cheat too much.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote