Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Hillary and the Russian Assets

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    5,323

    Hillary and the Russian Assets

    I see Hillary Clinton is intimating that Tulsi Gabbard is an asset of the Russians (as was Jill Stein) who may run as a third party candidate to sabotage the Democrats’ chances in 2020.

    Why some cable news network hasn’t snapped her up to provide this kind of trenchant political analysis is a mystery to me. Or possibly the result of a vast conspiracy of some sort.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    7,346
    And meanwhile Tulsi thinks Clinton controls the media (discussing bias would be one thing and fair enough, but saying it is because Clinton controls the media, just slides into completely unhinged). They are both sounding out of their gourds, Tulsi was mostly reacting so I can cut her a bit more slack as it may have been pure reactivity, but nonetheless, she is making no sense. Backing away from both of them (granted not that I was their voting base before).

    Jill Stein will probably not be the Green party candidate, not that there is anything much wrong with her, but Greens have better candidates I think (that will go nowhere in the general, well yes of course).
    If you want something to get done, ask a busy person. If you want them to have a nervous breakdown that is.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,062
    This is a good example of the saying Women are their own worst enemies.

  4. #4
    Senior Member catherine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    9,700
    Well, at least she's leaving Bernie alone this time. But she probably had something to do with his heart attack.
    "Do any human beings ever realize life while they live it--every, every minute?" Emily Webb, Our Town
    www.silententry.wordpress.com

  5. #5
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    6,512
    I think if Fearless Leader really wanted to influence our elections he may pump several hundred million dollars into Boris and Natasha's personal lifestyle foundation while they still had political influence.

    Oh, he did?

    Sucker........
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

  6. #6
    Senior Member bae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Offshore
    Posts
    7,972
    It's like the Democrats *want* to throw the election.

    Though, looking at the intelligence reports on Russian interference in our elections, this is just the sort of thing they'd do - sow disinformation and conspiracy theories, and get someone vaguely influential to buy into one of them and repeat the agitprop.

    Clinton - "useful idiot"

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,084
    Who cares what Clinton says. She is gone!

  8. #8
    Senior Member bae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Offshore
    Posts
    7,972
    Quote Originally Posted by frugal-one View Post
    Who cares what Clinton says. She is gone!
    Well, just 3 years ago she received the majority of the popular vote for President, she's directly participated in multiple presidential campaign runs, and she was Secretary of State and presumably knows a thing or two about the Russians,

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    5,323
    Quote Originally Posted by frugal-one View Post
    Who cares what Clinton says. She is gone!
    I thought that back in 2008. But she lingers on like an old email you thought was deleted.

  10. #10
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    14,910
    Quote Originally Posted by Yppej View Post
    This is a good example of the saying Women are their own worst enemies.
    But why can’t this just be two politicians dissing each other? Why does it matter that they’re women?

    I do wonder why Hillary is considered relevant now, but it was just a few years ago that she came very close to winning And at the time Bill was still the crown prince of the Democratic Party. So I wouldn’t count her out but certainly she is less powerful.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •