of course being that the working and non-working population are probably overwhelmingly the EXACT SAME people at different times in life (sure there are exceptions, grown kids that never leave the basement, kept women that never do a days paid labor, well at least their hard-working benefactors will breath a much welcome sign of relief - and they deserve it! But *overwhelmingly* they are the exact same people). So, I guess we will have to go with people will be very satisfied with the situation or at least neutral being that the working population IS the non-working population.Something like 60% of the population is employed. Paying for a single payer system by putting the entire burden on a payroll tax while at the same time eliminating any subsidies they get though employers would almost certainly increase their combined out of pocket and tax burden substantially; although I would think the non-working population would be very satisfied with the situation.
P.S. what does 60% of the population is employed even mean? In jobs with health insurance, or gig and contract work without it? What does working actually mean?