Interesting article ANM. Thanks for posting.
Interesting article ANM. Thanks for posting.
I agree.
Since Charles and Philip have talked about downsizing the Royals, - perhaps, just maybe, - Harry and Meghan have indicated that they see the writing on the wall and are insisting that they be part of the conversation and consultation rather than simply pawns in the game.
As Cicero said, “Gratitude is not only the greatest of virtues, but the parent of all the others.”
Can a semi-mystical bond between monarch and subject ultimately survive being defined down to a brand?
Can ancillary royals limit their obligations to the system while at the same time leveraging their royal status commercially and politicaly Kardashian style without subtracting something from the House of Windsor?
This BBC article talks about where H&M’s money comes from.
https://www.bbc.com/news/explainers-51047186
that could be, royals is not my expertise.Perhaps you’re thinking of The Netherlands. The king (Wilhem something?) is a pilot for KLM.
Trees don't grow on money
Thought that you might find this interesting. I didn't see the play myself but am amused by the coincidence.
https://www.mirvish.com/news/harry-a...tm_campaign=OM
As Cicero said, “Gratitude is not only the greatest of virtues, but the parent of all the others.”
This article was interesting. I hadn't realized that there were only 5 media outlets that are given access to the royal family. No wonder the paparazzi are so obnoxious.
And if the double standard presented by the article is accurate, no wonder they want out.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...PUHSIeZ1OuHKVQ
Amazing jp1.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)