Page 7 of 20 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 194

Thread: ACB Hearings

  1. #61
    Senior Member jp1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,829
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan View Post
    I must have missed that. I have noticed over these past few days how every other questioner has spent the majority of their 30 minute questioning period trying to imply her intention to overturn everything that's dear to them, but haven't seen her approach the bait.

    What did I miss?
    She inadvertently stated that she views sexual orientation as a choice.

  2. #62
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    9,401
    Quote Originally Posted by jp1 View Post
    At least she did inadvertently explain how she intends to justify overturning marriage equality.
    Quote Originally Posted by jp1 View Post
    She inadvertently stated that she views sexual orientation as a choice.
    What does her view have to do with marriage equality and why do you think she intends to overturn it?
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

  3. #63
    Senior Member jp1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,829
    Because she’s said as much. And she’s going to justify it by stating that not being heterosexual is a choice therefore not subject to the same rights as other people.

    She very specifically was willing to agree with being against marriage discrimination yesterday when asked about black people deserving equal rights and very not willing to do so with regard to LGBT people. You can ignore it all you want but if a case giving her the opportunity comes up I fully expect her to vote to overturn marriage equality and I will be here to sadly say i told you so.’ It won’t affect me either way because I live in a progressive state but it WILL harm people in less progressive states.

  4. #64
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    9,401
    Quote Originally Posted by jp1 View Post
    Because she’s said as much. And she’s going to justify it by stating that not being heterosexual is a choice therefore not subject to the same rights as other people.
    I suppose you're basing all this on her use of the phrase "sexual preference" rather than the preferred "sexual orientation" while answering a question. I know that we can all often read very much from very little but I have to admire the leap you took on that one.
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

  5. #65
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    2,777
    Words matter

  6. #66
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,323
    When did “sexual preference” become offensive? The media is full of instances of people on the left using it. Is it one of those terms permissible only to particular speakers?

  7. #67
    Senior Member bae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Offshore
    Posts
    11,483
    Apparently it has been an ongoing evolution of the language.

    The New York Times Style Guide from 2013 says:

    sexual orientation. Never sexual preference, which carries the disputed implication that sexuality is a matter of choice. Cite a person's sexual orientation only when it is pertinent and its pertinence is clear to the reader. Also see bisexual; gay; lesbian; straight.

    An article from 1991 in American Psychologist says:

    "The term sexual orientation is preferred to sexual preference for psychological writing and refers to sexual and affectional relationships of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and heterosexual people. The word preference suggests a degree of voluntary choice that is not necessarily reported by lesbians and gay men and that has not been demonstrated in psychological research."

  8. #68
    Senior Member catherine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    14,678
    LDAHL, in terms of the left use of the word "preference" you may be confusing "sexual preference" for preferences for gender/pronoun identification which is a preference for how one wants to be identified from a gender, not sexual perspective.
    "Do any human beings ever realize life while they live it--every, every minute?" Emily Webb, Our Town
    www.silententry.wordpress.com

  9. #69
    Senior Member jp1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,829
    Quote Originally Posted by Tammy View Post
    Words matter
    And lawyers choose them VERY carefully because they understand this better than the rest of us.

    It's actually pretty remarkable that she made this slip considering how completely robotic and inhumanly devoid of opinions she has managed to make herself seem otherwise, which makes it all the more telling that it happened.

  10. #70
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    2,777
    Yes. I saw it as a big tell, most likely revealing two things: 1. Her own opinion and 2. The opinions and words used by those she spends the bulk of her time with.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •