Page 14 of 20 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 194

Thread: ACB Hearings

  1. #131
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,325
    I don’t see much in all the “theocracy” tripe either. I like a judge who prefers the letter of the law to social justice outcomes. I think she will serve the Court and the country well over the next few decades.

    I think the furious effort to redefine “court packing” is indicative of the nonsense to come.

  2. #132
    Senior Member Teacher Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    12,889
    She hasn’t been a federal judge long at all. There’s so many more qualified judges that could have been appointed. Merrick Garland was much more qualified. Her appointment is another travesty just like the G appointment. It’s a race to the bottom. Being appointed now by this administration is actually a insult. Qualified judges not wanted.

  3. #133
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    9,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Teacher Terry View Post
    She hasn’t been a federal judge long at all. There’s so many more qualified judges that could have been appointed. Merrick Garland was much more qualified. Her appointment is another travesty just like the G appointment. It’s a race to the bottom. Being appointed now by this administration is actually a insult. Qualified judges not wanted.
    And yet everyone who actually knows her academic and judicial history disagrees with you. Isn't that great?
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

  4. #134
    Senior Member Teacher Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    12,889
    Most of her colleagues that she taught with at the university all signed a letter opposing her appointment. That’s not disagreement)

  5. #135
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,325
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan View Post
    And yet everyone who actually knows her academic and judicial history disagrees with you. Isn't that great?
    Yes, but merely being rated well-qualified by the ABA is not enough. There is the higher Ideological standard of the cosplaying culture warriors demanding promises in advance to rule certain approved ways for certain cases.

  6. #136
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,325
    Quote Originally Posted by Teacher Terry View Post
    Most of her colleagues that she taught with at the university all signed a letter opposing her appointment. That’s not disagreement)
    Their objection was to the circumstances of her appointment, not to her qualifications.

  7. #137
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    25,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Teacher Terry View Post
    Most of her colleagues that she taught with at the university all signed a letter opposing her appointment. That’s not disagreement)
    terry, look at your source.Are any of the dissenters law school colleagues? Nope.

    I do realize that several librarians signed the petition to remove Amy CB’s name (and yes, it was about circumstances of her appointment, not so much her qualifications ) so if you consider librarians to be the pinnacle of correctness, well then. There we have it, Amy is out! Probably the American Library Association has a resolution about it because that is so much their business. Not.

    I stopped sending membership dues to the American Library Association more than a decade before I retired because I became very tired of their political strife and how much energy that sucked up from the organization. The straw that broke the camels back was, for me, an endless debate at a convention that had to do with Cuban dissidents, were they librarians or not? It was an intellectual freedom issue which normally interests me, this whole debate about their status just not worthy of 60 minutes of furious shouting.

  8. #138
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,037
    Quote Originally Posted by iris lilies View Post
    oh please. There is so much projection about this competent young(ish) woman and the evil she will bring.

    I just dont see it.

    The ACA case will ( ?) turn on the sticky wicket of the bugabear mandatory purchase issue. At least, from the skim reading i’ve done, that seems to be the point of law being argued. You have to do some mighty mental gymnastics to find a Handmaid’s Tale in that point of law.
    Seriously? Have you read about her?
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...se/ar-BB19LQqM

  9. #139
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Teacher Terry View Post
    It’s such a sad day for so many people especially women.
    I agree. This is a step backward.

  10. #140
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,037
    Quote Originally Posted by LDAHL View Post
    I don’t see much in all the “theocracy” tripe either. I like a judge who prefers the letter of the law to social justice outcomes. I think she will serve the Court and the country well over the next few decades.

    I think the furious effort to redefine “court packing” is indicative of the nonsense to come.
    After this, I hope the Dems win and do court packing. After all, that is what the Republicans just did.. 6-3 is not an equitable split. At least add a few more to make it more of an even balance.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •