My definition of simple living is just as valid as anyone else's and I'm not one bit hesitant in stating it and defending it. Plus I love the way everyone jumps on the word sloth in their totally judgemental way while daring to call me judgemental. I said having only modest goals when you're capable of more is either sloth or lack of ambition.
If you have the capability to reach for bigger goals but you don't do it, how do you justify saying that isn't lack of ambition?
If you're content with lacking ambition, or even proud of it as a proper Buddhist would be, then more power to you. Whatever works for you is fine with me. But my point was and remains that living simply isn't really "simple living" unless it is voluntary simplicity, and having reasonable goals is more important than having modest goals. That's my definition and I'm sticking to it. YMMV and you're welcome to it, because when everyone thinks alike, no one is thinking very much.