Good question. I've read that the busiest year during the Ellis Island era was 1907 when just over one million immigrants were processed. I think we're currently taking that amount on an annual basis, at least over the past decade or so.
I would think not since the number of jobs in any country is not static and it seems to me that more people will create more jobs, I guess the question is whether job creation can/will equal new arrivals.Did we run out of jobs for people when Ellis island was operating at it’s peak?
I suppose historically a little of both in the short term and probably leaning to the positive side over time. But I think the burden level is now higher since social safety networks funded by the public were practically non-existent during the Ellis Island days but are now a staple, depended upon by an ever increasing percentage of current citizens before even taking immigrants into account. I doubt that situation is sustainable in the long run.Were the immigrants that came through Ellis island good for the country or a burden? And is there reason to believe that current immigrants would be more or less of a burden than those that came through Ellis island?