So those of you who think the “vigilantes” should have stayed home - do you include business owners trying to protect their businesses? Remember the rooftop Koreans from the 1992 LA riots. They had ARs, I believe.
So those of you who think the “vigilantes” should have stayed home - do you include business owners trying to protect their businesses? Remember the rooftop Koreans from the 1992 LA riots. They had ARs, I believe.
Yeah, the 'vigilante' argument is a little more self serving than being actually useful. Society has a long history of people standing up and volunteering to help solve a problem or mitigate destruction. I remember after 9/11 our military branches were inundated with volunteers wishing to do their part in protecting our country, I guess they were all 'vigilantes' too.
"Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein
And if the armed man would have stayed at home, no one would have been killed and the property would be just as destroyed?
I'm not convinced of the need or use of a lone untrained person of any age acting in the role of vigilante among an aggitated crowd, though I seem to have a strange appreciation for the Black Panthers.
Roger you are right that two people would still be alive if that kid had stayed home.
noone confuses volunteering for the military with vigilantism. Were the wars misguided, yes, but that's an entirely different subject.I remember after 9/11 our military branches were inundated with volunteers wishing to do their part in protecting our country, I guess they were all 'vigilantes' too.
Trees don't grow on money
Dictionary
vig·i·lan·te
/ˌvijəˈlan(t)ē/
noun: vigilante; plural noun: vigilantes
a member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)