For today’s thought bubble about gender politics
https://harvardlawreview.org/print/v...ates-v-varner/
where the tldr is: case law supports judges not having to use correct speak’s preferred pronouns, or compelling them to be used, in his/her court. It is OK to call a natal man who identifies as a woman a “man” in court and refer to him as “he.”
I can just imagine a rape victim having to testify about her rape experience
by “another woman “when the crime was committed by a man with a penis. That would be an added indignity for the victim, another painful aspect of her experience.
As we watch the rise in violent crimes against persons by “women” we need to keep in mind the transitioning population. Crime stats over the next few years will be interesting.