I think it's FALSE to interpret a crack down on hyrdroflourocarbons as a crackdown on A/C. Because I believe there are newer A/C technologies without that. Now I'm not saying we all have them now, I live in an ancient apartment why would I have anything new and high tech in my building. I rather wish someone would force them to upgrade my apartment, but that is also not how anything tends to work, it tends to be only new installations/products.
Reading that EPA articles is on the face of it very impressive, maybe it's not as good as it seems, but on the face of it. That's the kind of policy we should have for ALL greenhouse gasses (not just hyrdoflurocarbons), yea I know there's a treaty for that and there isn't really for C02. But the approach makes sense.
And yes if you are watching/reading Fox news, it's the junk food of news. Although honestly maybe I am being a bit too hard on Fox *news* here, as I see that is clearly labeled as an opinion column, meaning it's not even labeled a news article and even pretending to be objective. So although Fox has been in court for falsehoods, in this case it would be silly to even expect it to have any standards, as it's an opinion column, so it can be entirely made up.