Personal opinion is that this isn't a originalist interpretation of the Constitution, but a revisionist off ramp to avoid some sort of civil unrest and a broken cog in the voting process. It was hardly unexpected, but I'm surprised that the conservative justices resorted to such a liberal interpretation. But, I'm no expert of the matter. It not the last day in court for Trump.
"what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?" Mary Oliver
A friend sent me a photo of his republican primary ballot. In Colorado if you declare as an independent they send a primary ballot for both parties, but you can only vote and return one or the other. Friend is about as blue as the sky, but his plan is to vote against Trump, i.e. Haley. Since he is most obviously not a conservative with any allegiance to the Republic party, I questioned whether it is deceptive and not the intention in the voting process, or if it's fair game in politics.
"what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?" Mary Oliver
I have been back and forth about this in my own mind, but have currently settled on this: it is ok to vote strategically to keep whoever you want off the ballot…
edited to add: even more so if you want to keep someone off the ballot in order to keep them out of office. I am less tolerant of supporting a stalking horse situation.
I am not a serious person.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)