Computers counting votes OMG. Half of the time I can not even turn on my new iPad or even type the correct words with what they call a key board.
gee gregg, while you are quoting me from another thread, why didn't you include the part where I said that when voter fraud happened in the past, it usually occurs in the transmission of votes, or in the counting of votes (Florida, although it also helped that Bush had a brother to 'help' him along).
Pretty disingenuous to try to take my words out of context (you know we were discussing individual voter fraud) and use them here, which is probably why it is bad form and frowned upon to lift words from another thread to use elsewhere. Right? But you know that, as a moderator and all....
For the record, my words, that were lifted from another thread and used here (against me i presume) were from a discussion about voter ID laws requiring ridiculous hoop jumping to vote. Individuals voting, or not voting. Not a discussion about vote counting, tossing registrations (which apparently is a favorite tactic of the right) or rigging voting machines. In these areas, voter fraud DOES happen. Voter ID laws don't address this.
Thanks Alan for link. In the discussion after that article, was a link that that seemed to answer my question
http://verifiedvoting.org/verifier/ a database of the voting machine technologies and the vendors, around the USA
According to this data base, Hart Intercivic is the vendor of machines for either absentee or in-person voting in
California
Colorado
Indiana
Kentucky
Hawaii
Illinois
Oklahoma
Tennessee
Texas
Virginia (Alexandrai, Charlottesville, Falls Church)
Washington
Incidentally Diebold and Sequoia also are major vendors. If I have a little spare time I'd like to find out if either of those two companies are under investigation for allegations of rigging voting results.
In Ohio, Hart Intercivic does the job for Hamilton County (565,418 registered voters) and Williams County (25,633 registered voters).
Based on the NYT listing of "Swing" Presidential States with the most electoral votes up for grabs in 2012, the vendors of vote-counting machinery are:
Florida (29 Electoral Votes)
Diebold
Election Systems and Software
Sequoia Voting Systems
Pennsylvania (20 Electoral Votes)
Diebold
Election Systems and Software
Hart Intercivic
Sequoia Voting Systems
Danaher Controls
Ohio (18 Electoral Votes)
Diebold
Election Systems and Software
Hart Intercivic
Virginia (13 Electoral Votes)
Diebold
Election Systems and Software
Hart Intercivic
Sequoia Voting Systems
Advanced Voting Systems
Unilect
Peripheral Dynamics
http://tinyurl.com/d3jltam
The above Washington Post article talks about campaign shenanigans in a Democratic Congressman's Virgina district. Were they planning to cast ballots for dead people? hmmmm, you decide.
"Back when I was a young boy all my aunts and uncles would poke me in the ribs at weddings saying your next! Your next! They stopped doing all that crap when I started doing it to them... at funerals!"
I wonder if the situation was reversed, and it was the Obama family who owned stock in these voting machine companies, which also just happened to be used in critical states - would we hear any concern then? or would it also just be laughably paranoid?
Voter fraud and election tampering are different issues.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)