The UN has provided a venue for many a thug, tyrant and murderer (including some Nobel laureates) for many years now. What's so shocking about the US trying to contain the threat of nuclear weapons in the hands of a guy who feeds people to dogs? Does your gift of clarity not tell you that every president of the postwar era has made (with varying degrees of eloquence) that same "threat to untold million"? It's been a fact of life for decades. You may consider standing up to the likes of Kim shameful. Speaking for myself, and not my zip code, blood type or hat size, I take a certain amount of pride in it.
I'm sure any one of a number of humans having even a nodding acquaintance with statecraft and/or diplomacy could come up with a better speech than that cretinous clod did. Or maybe he'd just like to get down in the mud and wrestle Kim Jong Un. We've done just fine ignoring N. Korea for sixty years, and Twitter-boy is not the one to ride to the rescue. An all-out war would probably--at least temporarily--save him from the Russian money-laundering/American election rigging juggernaut barreling toward him. He certainly doesn't care how many lives may be lost in the process.
"Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein
Understood. It is the end of life. Eternity stops. Go out into the tunnel. To the chamber of the ages. Cry for the children. Walk carefully in the vault of tomorrow. Sorrow for the murdered children. The thing you search for is there. Go. Go. Sadness. Sadness for the end of things.
But I don't think we're just doing fine, given the fact he is launching missiles and detonating hydrogen bombs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)