PDA

View Full Version : Peak Globalization? Inspiring jobs?



razz
8-9-16, 7:28am
What do you think of this viewpoint? I think that he makes some really good points.
From the twice weekly communication: www.MauldinEconomics.com


"That’s my theory: We are going full circle.

Humanity spent the last 50 years globalizing. Now, thanks to certain technologies, that whole process is going in reverse. I think historians will mark the 2008 financial crisis as the turning point: Peak Globalization.

I don’t say this because I want a de-globalized world. What any of us want or don’t want is irrelevant. I believe the transition will happen whether any of us want it or not.

It will not happen in a linear fashion, though. The process that brought us to this point had starts, stops, and slowdowns. Reverse globalization will have ups and downs, too, but a new set of technologies will keep pushing it forward.

I’ll tell you about those technologies in a minute. First, let’s review what brought us to this point.

1.Low-Tech Boxes
McLean, owner of a North Carolina trucking firm, had the idea of separating a truck’s cargo space from the wheels and chassis, then loading the boxes onto ships. He converted two World War II tanker ships for this purpose and in 1956 took his first containerized cargo from Newark to Houston.

Seeing the value of standardization, McLean licensed his patents royalty-free to competitors worldwide. By the end of the 1960s container ships were crossing every ocean. Sea-Land had a thriving business taking military supplies from the US to Vietnam.

2. Jet liners
Just as important, the mere knowledge that they could reach the other side of the world so easily changed people’s thinking. They saw new possibilities and dreamed bigger dreams. Those dreams evolved into the millions of transoceanic trading relationships we now call globalization. Would it have happened in a propeller-driven world? Maybe – but it would look different.

3. Another key technology helped people see the other side of the world even if they couldn’t fly there. Communications satellites let broadcasters beam live television signals around the globe. The satellites emerged at about the same time as shipping containers and jetliners.

4. Mutual funds grew even faster after 1978, when Congress added an obscure “section 401(k)” to the Internal Revenue Code. Benefits consultant Ted Benna saw that the provision allowed for a tax-advantaged retirement savings plan. Mutual funds were a natural fit with his 401(k) plan. Even better, they gave CFOs everywhere a way to get defined-benefit plan liabilities off the corporate balance sheet. They eagerly seized it.

Much of the cash flowing into mutual funds during this era found its way into multinational companies, who used it to develop new products for international distribution. It was more wind in the sails of globalization. The giant 1980s–1990s bull market both demonstrated and reinforced the worldwide economic growth wave."

Now we have energy alternatives to fossil fuels that will expand causing huge changes, 3D design to 'manufacture on demand' making localized "inshoring of jobs" the new alternative, virtual reality for communication...

I found this whole letter an interesting rebuttal to all the gloom and doom of today's media. Enjoy!

FYI - I had to correct the subject due to autocorrect overriding my words

LDAHL
8-9-16, 8:47am
While I realize that one person's doom is another person's progress, I've often thought doomers of various stripes share a common lack of imagination.

Rogar
8-9-16, 9:58am
Interesting subject. There have been all of the transportation and advances to get us to the globalization we have now. Different, but not totally separate have been the technology advances that each seem to give an initial bump to the economy, but seem to eventually result in job losses due to automation and 3rd world production. The NYT times had an interesting related article saying that global growth, at least in the industrialized nations, may be permanently slowing. I have an opinion that the economists, with their various manipulations of interest rates and stimulus, have disguised how potentially bad global growth could actually be, but have propped up things with a house of cards. Maybe we have reached the natural end of the global growth bubble.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/07/upshot/were-in-a-low-growth-world-how-did-we-get-here.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=0

JaneV2.0
8-9-16, 10:27am
While I realize that one person's doom is another person's progress, I've often thought doomers of various stripes share a common lack of imagination.

I tend to agree with you. I'm just Little Mary Sunshine. >8)

LDAHL
8-9-16, 2:02pm
I tend to agree with you. I'm just Little Mary Sunshine. >8)

We're doomed unless someone thinks of something; and somebody always thinks of something.

JaneV2.0
8-9-16, 2:18pm
And the doomsters often have a vested interest in being gloomy.

LDAHL
8-9-16, 2:32pm
And the doomsters often have a vested interest in being gloomy.

There is good money to be made in frightening the public and then marketing the solution.