Originally Posted by
Williamsmith
I won't protest your apparent abilities to to withstand obnoxious billionaires but have no time for self righteous politicians ( aren't all politicians self righteous)....
but I will ask that you consider the obnoxious billionaire we refer to as Singer as being even a little too obnoxious. So let's say you bought a car for $6300 and you took a loan out. Let's say that loan came due one day and you couldn't pay it. So in good faith, because unlike corporations you as an individual can not declare bankruptcy for this loan, you negotiate.
But you find out Mr. Singer has bought the bad debt off your prior lender. You do not realize he bought it for $480 but he did. Anyway, upon negotiating, you are advised that Mr. Singer now values your debt at $25,000. After all, there is interest that has accrued. You offer to pay Mr. Singer $2000 hoping he will be understanding that here is no way you will ever pay back four times the original value of the loan.
Instead of being understanding, Mr Singer sends representatives to your property and kidnaps your dog. He says he will give it back if you pay. You protest to the local district justice and get the dog back legally. Mr. Singer is not happy. So he sues you for the money you have in a life insurance plan. $1200.
Now, you were willing to pay him four times his investment on your debt but he wasn't satisfied because he is an obnoxious billionaire, and he didn't get to be that rich by being ethical. So after all his pissing around what does he get?
Knight to kings bishop three