Gregg, I'm telling Mrs. M on you. Since she is the informal resident leader of the anti-salad-spinner contingent I'm sure she'd like to hear of this transgression...
Printable View
I thought this article would be of interest
http://news.yahoo.com/presented-lett...-politics.html
Apparently Ryan was hypercritical of the stimulus however requested some of it.
I imagine these types of articles and accusations are going to be a daily occurance for both candidates and their inner circles.
Perhaps one of the most damning things about Ryan, and actually there are many, is his bill for 'Personhood'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...elections-2012
This is a bill that would criminalize abortion, for any reason...ANY reason, as well as some forms of birth control. IUD This is the far far right push to give rights to a fertilized egg! He wants to defund planed parenthood, as well as drastically cut spending for aid to single mothers and poor kids. What a prince, huh?! Oh, and to just make sure the punch to the jaw is coupled with a kick in the gut, he of course will repeal Obamacare, as well as destroy medicare and medicaid.
But, never worry, the very wealthy will get a tax break, as in NO tax for capitol gains, so, it's all good!;)
The aspect of this that usually gets short shrift in this argument is that this includes the LIFE OF THE MOTHER! I'm a bleeding heart liberal and anti-abortion. So I can kind of understand the arguments for personhood and rape and incest--although personhood is pushing it too far for me. I believe an implanted fetus shouldn't be killed because of the circumstances of its fertilization.
But LIFE OF THE MOTHER? The mother should DIE rather than the fetus? Why is the fetus' life MORE valuable than that of its mother? To me, this is utterly absurd and smacks of nothing less than misogyny. I wonder what those personhood proponents would argue if the fetus was only female?
Ezra Klein makes the argument that Ryan's rise to prominence has largely been the result of the Obama Administration's effort to create a villain they could oppose in the media.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...is-budget.html
You mean there weren't enough righty villains already? Talk about a zombie army!
http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/artists/snoozer/zomby.gif http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/artists/snoozer/zomby.gif http://www.kolobok.us/smiles/artists/snoozer/zomby.gif
When your record is lamentable, your signature policies unpopular and your ideas threadbare, there can never be enough villains. With little worth defending, attack is the only viable strategy. You need villains in the past like the baneful Bush to excuse your current failures. You need a pantheon of plutocratic malefactors like the carcinogenic Romney or the wheelchair-shoving Ryan to convince the gullible that there are even worse choices than yourself.