Fell for that one, did you?
Printable View
I wasn't familiar with that allegation so I had to look it up.
The rumors and memes about JD Vance and a couch originated from a
false claim posted on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) in July 2024.
Here is a breakdown of the incident:
- The Origin: On July 15, 2024, the day Vance was announced as Donald Trump's running mate, an X user (later identified as @rickrudescalves) posted that Vance's 2016 memoir, Hillbilly Elegy, included a passage about having sex with an "inside-out latex glove shoved between two couch cushions".
- The Truth: The claim is entirely fabricated. The supposed passage does not exist in the book, and the words "sofa" and "glove" do not appear in Hillbilly Elegy.
- The Spread: Despite being a complete fabrication, the joke went viral, spawning countless memes and becoming a staple of online mockery.
- The Retracted Fact-Check: The Associated Press (AP) published a fact-check article with the headline "No, JD Vance Did Not Have Sex With a Couch," but later deleted it, noting it had not gone through their standard editing process.
- Response: The author of the original post acknowledged it was a joke and later made their account private. The joke was later referenced by political figures, including Tim Walz during the 2024 campaign. https://www.simplelivingforum.net/im...AASUVORK5CYII=NPR +6
In summary, JD Vance did not write about or engage in the act described in the meme; it was a widely spread internet hoax. https://www.simplelivingforum.net/im...AAAElFTkSuQmCC
Also, the phrase "inside-out latex glove" is problematic:
- How could an observer know it was inside-out? The account seems unnecessarily specific.
- "Inside-out" is itself troublesome, for reasons that might be evident
- Latex? Nobody sane would use latex for such a practice, latex is well known to produce allergies. I fund out local reproductive health services to distribute non-latex condoms for this reason.
The account has all the hallmarks of "urban legend", before you even consult Snopes.