Trans Days…

For today’s thought bubble about gender politics

https://harvardlawreview.org/print/v...ates-v-varner/

where the tldr is: case law supports judges not having to use correct speak’s preferred pronouns, or compelling them to be used, in his/her court. It is OK to call a natal man who identifies as a woman a “man” in court and refer to him as “he.”

I can just imagine a rape victim having to testify about her rape experience
by “another woman “when the crime was committed by a man with a penis. That would be an added indignity for the victim, another painful aspect of her experience.

As we watch the rise in violent crimes against persons by “women” we need to keep in mind the transitioning population. Crime stats over the next few years will be interesting.

I suppose now that republicans have turned ‘fake trans woman’ into a real thing you are probably correct. I’d be curious what the current stats of ‘fake trans woman’ going into a women’s restroom to act maliciously towards women is? My guess is that the number is radically lower than the number of people killed by guns, a topic republicans have ZERO interest in fixing. Not surprising since republicans have a tendency to focus on nonexistent, or very minimally existent, problems because those problems whip their base up into a rabid froth for whatever reason.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jp1

I suppose now that republicans have turned ‘fake trans woman’ into a real thing you are probably correct. I’d be curious what the current stats of ‘fake trans woman’ going into a women’s restroom to act maliciously towards women is? My guess is that the number is radically lower than the number of people killed by guns, a topic republicans have ZERO interest in fixing. Not surprising since republicans have a tendency to focus on nonexistent, or very minimally existent, problems because those problems whip their base up into a rabid froth for whatever reason.

---

Well, in one view, they are all fake women, whether trans or “fake” (as you say) trans. Maybe a distinction without a difference. And now the medical community is talking realistically about surgical implantation of uterus and ovaries. What a brave new world that will be.
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org...ge%20benefits.

As for solving “ people killed by guns” please do tell, what is the answer? Didn’t your President just recently sign a bill that he touted as the most comprehensive gun control legislation in a long time? Did that not solve it all?

Oh there is very much a difference between the fake trans women that republicans have created and real trans women. But whatever. Continue on with your vendetta against trans people and drag queens. Hating others for being different is the only agenda the Republican Party has anymore so you might as well fully embrace it.

[QUOTE=iris lilies;428954]Well, in one view, they are all fake women, whether trans or “fake” (as you say) trans. Maybe a distinction without a difference. And now the medical community is talking realistically about surgical implantation of uterus and ovaries. What a brave new world that will be.
https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org...ge%20benefits.

As for solving “ people killed by guns” please do tell, what is the answer? Didn’t your President just recently sign a bill that he touted as the most comprehensive gun control legislation in a long time? Did that not solve it all?[/QUOTE]

The gun law put through was as far as the republicans would allow. It was like putting a bandaid on a hemmorrhage! One answer is never to vote republican again!

Somewhere on this forum we talked about the trans person Artemis who joined a female sorority at the University of Wyoming without an honest vote of the members because the powers that be at that sorority determined Artemis would become a member. Period. They did not Follow their usual process of secret ballot voting.

Artemis entered the sorority and hung around when the girls were going to and from from showers. Artemis was reported to have erections while he sikently watched girls. Artemis was reported to in a creepy way talk to the girls about their body parts. The sorority girls sued their sorority for allowing a non-woman in.

Today a judge dismissed the case saying it wasn’t up to the courts how this private entity, a sorority, defines woman.

I don’t have a real problem with the court’s decision. I *AM* sorry, tho, that Artemis will continue to be present to harass some girls and they were not able to get relief from anyone in a position to help or protect them. Is this a Minority of girls in the sorority? I don’t know.

Is it OK If not all members are at ease with all members?

Are we no longer to Believe all women! ? Until it is inconvenient for trans folks.

I wonder what will happen when freshman girls find their college roommate is a man ideating as female. Would a girl have any grounds to be supported if she was uncomfortable with that, and could she call for that to situation to change? Or, will she be expected to put up with it and shut up?

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/...fere-100284035


here is Artemis during the initial periods of pledge time. Artemis is the hulk in the orange shirt. To be fair Artemis is presenting a bit more on the feminine scale these days, at least for media interviews.

Attachment 5631

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...t-breasts.html

i appreciate The Daily Mail’s continuing ability to serve up silly bits of human activity, much like The New York Post. What would we do without them keeping us informed? :)

Anyways… that opposite sex ideating teacher (aka “trans”) in Canada with the ginormous breasts who was placed on leave several months ago has been rehired. Word on the street is that he showed up to work this week sans breasts, looking like a man, with stubble.

I don’t know if this is just one chapter in several to come or if it is The End.

I am cutting the school board slack because we have no knowledge of what their legal team is telling them they must do. If they do anything too drastic to this ideating man, they might be hauled in front of one of those Canadian tribunals for wrong think. If they were in England, the cops would pay them a visit and possibly bring them down to the station for further probing.

Until this guy comes out as saying he’s been trolling us all along, I put him in the same category as that creep who sits outside a movie theater in a trenchcoat flashing his junk to children. Same compulsion, different costume..

Canada seems to have proceeded further down the woke rabbit hole than we have. I’ve been reading about an Ontario school library “equity-informed weeding process” that has resulted in the removal of everything prior to 2008.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LDAHL

Canada seems to have proceeded further down the woke rabbit hole than we have. I’ve been reading about an Ontario school library “equity-informed weeding process” that has resulted in the removal of everything prior to 2008.

---

I once had a “challenge “in the library I worked for about a book that had the audacity to use an accepted term for its time, it had “ Negro “in the title. It was a published in the 1970s and was a standard text. But no matter, the young lady who complained was very worried that someone would be offended by that careful word.

So yes, I can see that anything before 2008 might be problematic so might as well chuck it all.

I've believed for some time that progressivism is simply fascism re-branded. Now, progressive governments are proving me correct.