Printable View
So far, Andrew Mountbatten Windsor was taken in for questioning re secret business information he was privy to as a Government Business Envoy. He is alleged to have passed this info to Epstein.
He cannot be charged here re Virginia Guiffre as she was 17 at the time, which is above the UK Age of Consent. There is some talk that charges of sex with a trafficked woman may follow, but so far it is speculation.
No, it is information released from Epstein’s files in the US and concerns giving Epstein state information obtained when AMW was a Govt appointee as a Business Envoy. ANdrew cannot be prosecuted in the UK as Guiffre was over the age of consent in the UK.Quote:
Originally Posted by Klunick
thanks for this clear delineation of what a charge could potentially be with Virginia G. As I read accounts, it’s murky. My question was: wasn’t she of legal age in the UK? But it is her potential as a trafficked person that could bring charges, got it. That seems like a reach.Quote:
Originally Posted by IshbelRobertson
Andrew MW may well have been involved in shady sexcapades with absolute minors, but not on British soil.
okay----what President Triumph ought to do, is send that special crew in that grabbed the Venzawaylan Dicktater, in ta grab ol' ex-prince Andrew, and resettle him in Fla(armpit of Americca). Keep him under certain restrictions and a steady supply of tarts, strumpets and harlots that are of certified legal age. He could maybe have his own reality show, too. But yeah---get him away from his fammily, especially his entitled brother and nephew. Yup.
Yes, she was. Age 16 is we call it the Age of Consent here. According to a Barrister friend, the trafficked person scenario is not likely to happen. Yes, he may well be guilty elsewhere, just not here.Quote:
Originally Posted by iris lilies
Well. The Andrew formerly known as Prince is of Stuart descent and that is currently proving problematic in removing him from the line of succession because it’s in conflict with a 1701 law that guarantees descendants of Sophia of Hanover remain by their birthright in the line of succession. Sophia was granddaughter to James Vi / I.Quote:
Originally Posted by bae
Andrew may be German, but he’s also Scottish. And Stuart.
As a Stuart I am conflicted on this issue.
As a Stewart of Appin, I couldn’t care less! He, his grifter wife and daughters have successfully fed on royal connections for decades. He is (almost certainly, IMO) a paedophile. I’m glad he is being shunned.Quote:
Originally Posted by iris lilies
I thought that would probably be your position. I’m just kidding when I say I’m “conflicted “cause I’m really not. Andrew is a slimy beast and he needs to go.Quote:
Originally Posted by IshbelRobertson
IL it is reported here that the daughters are being sidelined from most public royal events this year, eg Royal Ascot, Remembrance Sunday and Buck House ‘balcony’ events. Now the gossip mags and some red-top newspapers are stating that the marriage of one daughter (can never remember which is which) to an Italian man is in trouble as her family’s woes are impacting his interior design commissions, particularly in the USA.Quote:
Originally Posted by iris lilies
We are getting the reports about Beatrice and Eugenie not being included in family public events, such as no invitation to Ascot. had not heard about that one daughter’s marriage trouble, though.Quote:
Originally Posted by IshbelRobertson