Originally Posted by
ApatheticNoMore
Some people have said news should charge by article. I think that model makes some sense but I don't know much about newspaper economics. The main problem is their real revenue was NEVER subscribers, so it never was about if enough people are subscribing although less are, but the main revenue was always ads. But the ads as the main source of revenue model doesn't work anymore.
I think charging by article might work because noone wants to subscribe to a whole bunch of newspapers just to read articles because they want to read this article here and that one there, that gets very expensive very fast. But I don't know it could be there is no model that works. But it's not like they are attempting any either, so we've tried nothing and it didn't work.