Fair enough. And I agree with your comment about the streets in the upcoming days. And I merely meant to say something supportive regarding your willingness to protest in regards to what's gone down here. Rob
Printable View
More rabble for LDAHL to look down his nose at. Just like BLM marchers who were tired of their friends and relatives being targeted, harassed, and killed by out-of-control police officers, women have had it with being oppressed and patronized.
A woman I used to work with marched for the first time at the Woman's March in 2017, at 60-something. My protest days are over--at least in person--but I'll continue to pay attention and contribute in other ways. I hope this galvanizes a too-complacent public to act.
I'm too old and feeble to move. Chalk it up to "I regret."
I'm not sure what marching in the streets will accomplish in this case. How will this produce the desired change?
I think it's a way to illustrate that there are thousands of people riled up, and that's just the tip of the iceberg. People angry enough to take to the streets will likely work for change in other ways. On the other hand, Republicans demanding their due can just wave their money. ;)
that's generally all protest ever does, if one knows that going in, so much the better.Quote:
I think it's a way to illustrate that there are thousands of people riled up
Maybe it will be a push back against the court passing yet more draconian laws (I mean probably not, but possibly so)
I think you just inadvertently identified one of the odd , unfortunate potential consequences. A trans man who has sex with men who unintentionally ends up pregnant and is forced to carry to term. I can only imagine the emotional discord of being forced with threat of violence by the government that someone in that situation would feel.
equivalent to that of a cis woman in the same situation right?Quote:
I think you just inadvertently identified one of the odd , unfortunate potential consequences. A trans man who has sex with men who unintentionally ends up pregnant and is forced to carry to term. I can only imagine the emotional discord of being forced with threat of violence by the government that someone in that situation would feel.
Interestingly, Warren Buffett is making a stand too!
https://link.cnbc.com/public/28176018
Sure, protesting brings awareness to others who may not quite know about it, or may not think it’s that important until they see people turn out in the street, driving by crowds that are protesting, etc. Also it builds resolve for protestors out on the street, and it shows politicians what is up with their constituents.
Protesting can be a fun, free, teambuilding activity.
Hopefully, after yesterday's hearing, trump and "fellow" republicans will be prosecuted/held accountable for their actions. As Rob would say, "I will go out to celebrate."
I'm going to wear my Antarctic expedition wear, because I think it'll be a very very cold day in Hell before they face any real consequences. Alas.
Good news is I already have all the gear. (Covid put the kabosh on my planned job at McMurdo, alas again, but I had the clothing all sorted :-) )
Why not to vote Republican--because they have let a Mafia boss take over their party, and co-opt it for domestic terrorism.
It will be nearly impossible for many to start over elsewhere based on a number of factors... cost, language and barriers to entry... to name a few. Personally, I will be checking Ecuador. There are expat enclaves, good medical care, use the US dollar and easy to travel back to the US, if needed. Need to check the eligibility requirements, as well as, how much more expensive it has gotten since the last time I checked. It may no longe be feasible.
If enough of the right people leave I might not have to worry about mask mandates coming back.
I don't even know how I'd make a living in a whole new country. So I don't think it's happening. I mean that's pretty much as basic as it gets. It's hard enough to make a living in this country.
By the by I do idly think where I could get in, maybe Israel (right of return), maybe Denmark (partner's mom is a citizen). But is either really particularly practical?
Heard today trump is going to announce his bid for 2024. The word is this would make it harder to convict him of his crimes. I don't understand why though?
If God forbd Trump does get in again - and given that we are talking of the United States here I can totally see this happening - maybe there is an upside. Trump and his henchsupporers definitely DO put more pressure on this country to split apart. I need to try and remember that - thinking in terms of the long game and an inevitable split up of the Non United States.
Maybe it's gone so beyond repair that we are better off under Trump due to his quickening the timeline for split up? Food for thought. Rob
Mother Jones published an article about the Republican manifesto outlined in a 122 page brief (erroneously?) called "Blue Print to Save America" by the Republican Study Committee. They claim that 75% of Republican House lawmakers are on this committee. It is the policies they will likely pursue if they regain the Senate and/or possibly the presidency. Everything you might guess. Reduce taxes but increase military sending. Raise the age for Social Security benefits, replace the AFCA, develop fossil fuel production and hamstring the EPA and other climate change initiatives, plus every other conservative platform you might suspect including gay rights, abortion, etc. I was able to browse through it fairly easily, but not the details.
https://banks.house.gov/uploadedfile...final_copy.pdf
The problem is there are few good answers at this point. The status quo is just living under long term extremist minority rule, that maintains it's minority rule by subverting democratic accountability, no matter how completely it's agenda is opposed by public opinion. Basically democratic change is being made impossible.
I don't believe that things getting worse will make things better (accelerationism), it just generally makes things worse. But the Supreme Court is increasingly ruling the federal government is illegitimate, those who actually want to have a government (anarchists need not apply I suppose, but I doubt they really approve of this either), might look for such in regional alliances between states or whatever. Most states are just not well equipped to be a full government on their own.
I actually think of the country splitting with dread (partition of India, etc. as food for thought). We would most likely be in a quasi-to-total Gilead wanna-be, here in Ohio. We don't really have the means to move to a bluer state at present, although, honestly, we're kicking around worst-case ideas. We are in our mid-60s, with two adult children who are very underemployed, and I have 2 much older siblings (79 & 81), neither with kids/other family here, though the oldest is married. So there's that to factor in. Frankly, I'm really concerned about our future. I seem to have misplaced my pair of LDAHL's rose-colored glasses. . .
One thing I am very grateful for - there is a somewhat affordable blue state right next door to me - New Mexico. Not everyone has this - red or blue close to them like I do. Rob
I’m a cockeyed optimist who doesn’t see massive sentiment for the 55/45 states splitting off from the 45/55 states. Nor do I see budding fascist dictatorships or theocracies getting much traction in the real world either. Maybe I just don’t spend enough time in social media reality to see all the signs and portents.