Originally Posted by
bae
Forced. That's the key for me. The law forces invasion of a woman's person that if done against her will in other circumstances would be an assault warranting the use of lethal force to prevent...
No thanks.
I don't have a religious dog in this fight. That said, I am perfectly happy stipulating that the fetus is a human from the moment of conception, and that its interests require consideration. I just happen to think that a woman's interests in controlling her own person prevail over the baby's interests in occupying her womb against her will.