Just giving daddy Joe credit where credit is due.
He did not sink the market.
Way to go, Joe!
Printable View
Just giving daddy Joe credit where credit is due.
He did not sink the market.
Way to go, Joe!
I am hoping the lack of the tweet-of-the-day will reduce the "frothiness" of the market, and allow boring investors like myself to relax a bit.
He’s doing a great job making the sun rise every morning too.
Give them time to kill a few more pipelines, write some new regulations, cancel right to work laws and shore up the tax code. Elizabeth Warren has binders full of plans. The current economic tailwinds from opening up the economy can be overcome if we all work together.
good thing the stock market hasn't cared about reality in several decades.
"Right To Work" laws should always be called by their proper name: "Right To Exploit Your Workers" laws.
And if the Dems took away all the new tax breaks Trump and the Repubs gave to rich people we would all be a hell of a lot better off economically in terms of the national debt.
Hey! No theological discussions allowed!!!
We have to keep everything starkly stated as absolute Good or Evil with no gray areas allowed, not even a slight tinge of gray. Everything has to be absolutely Good or absolutely Evil so we can all totally hate each other for being on the wrong side of the absolutist dividing line!!!
Right To Work laws effectively take away the right of workers to organize and enter into collective bargaining agreements. Eliminating those laws would give unions more power to recruit and negotiate, but only because big employers are obviously exploiting their workers and the workers are fed up with it. Nothing forces an employee to join a union, accept a job at a unionized company, or enter a highly unionized profession. But so called Right To Work laws effectively take away their right to do those things.
For the record I've never belonged to a union, but if I went to work at a unionized company I would have no objection to joining the union. During my lifetime I've had many friends who were railroad employees or worked for car manufacturing companies and were strong union supporters, but most of the people I've known had non-union jobs. So I recognize that unions have both good and bad aspects, but the alternative is to give total power to the big corporations whose only goal is to get as much profit as possible from their workers at the lowest possible cost, and that is a much worse alternative. Here is a list of 9 pros and 9 cons of Right To Work: https://futureofworking.com/18-cruci...-to-work-laws/
The last company I worked for before retiring had a paragraph in the employee handbook that was clearly labeled "Anti-Union Policy" and stated that they were against unions because employees should express their concerns directly to management as individuals. And you know how far doing that will get you.
Don't forget what happened to Bush when he said that....
Attachment 3694
And here I try to start some thing nice about daddy Joe, and all we get is bashing of GW Bush. I guess they areTaking a quick break from Trump bashing.
It makes me wonder if daddy Joe supporters actually do support him
Anyone is better than the orange moron!
Sometimes in politics, that's the only option you get!
I'd much rather have a mixture of moderate/centrist Democrats and moderate/centrist Republicans in both houses of Congress and a middle-of-the-road President from the "Damned If I Know" party than any Congress/President combination I've seen in the last 30 years.
When the federal government is so bitterly divided along party lines that it's unwilling or unable to create laws and regulations that 70% of Americans would willingly support, there is something seriously wrong with the way we elect our "leaders".