Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 94

Thread: Republican Sharia Law

  1. #1
    Senior Member peggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,857

    Republican Sharia Law

    http://www.examiner.com/article/gop-...nst-sharia-law

    Oh the irony....


    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3429834.html


    Sharia law HAS come to America, and it's been brought to us by the republicans.
    We can quibble all day as to whether the NSA collecting numbers is 'destroying' our civil liberties, but here is an actual action by REPUBLICANS that in fact destroys our civil liberties. Here is real life, boots on the ground legislation that IS '1984'.

    Alan, perhaps the reason there has been an up-tick in the purchase of that book is because the republicans are using it as a guide. They should add 'The Handmaids Tale' to their reading list.

    If Wisconsin is successful in this, and there is no indication they won't be, more republican controlled states will push this type of thing through.
    Life under Tea Party Taliban rule....hows that working for ya Wisconsin?


    “When fascism comes to America, it will come wrapped in the flag and waving a cross,”

  2. #2
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    10,062
    Damned Gosh Darned Republicans. Standing up for the 2nd Amendment and suggesting local legislation to make sure people know that there may be a living baby rather than a simple clump of cells prior to destroying it.

    You're right! The War on Wimmenses Women continues unabated.




    Edited in order to ensure appreciation.
    Last edited by Alan; 6-13-13 at 11:58am.
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,143
    Oh yes, guerilla tactics all wrapped up in "life".

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,750
    My friends in WI are all pretty horrified by both. I've had a vaginal ultrasound. It was miserable, and I was there voluntarily. Women's reproductive freedoms are definitely under assault, in many places.

    Alan, I would appreciate you not choosing condescending language.

  5. #5
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    28,738
    peggy, you made me laugh with the title of this thread.

  6. #6
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    28,738
    The last time this came up during the last state doing the same thing, didn't we conclude that Planned Parenthood does transvaginal ultrasounds before abortions? This was a quote from their rep a little more than a year ago:

    That’s just the medical standard,” said Adrienne Schreiber, an official at Planned Parenthood’s Washington, D.C., regional office. “To confirm the gestational age of the pregnancy, before any procedure is done, you do an ultrasound.”

    She goes on to say later that if the woman is uncomfortable with the transvaginal ultrasound, she's going to be less than delighted with the actual abortion procedure which is even MORE invasive and "miserable."

  7. #7
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    10,062
    Quote Originally Posted by redfox View Post
    Alan, I would appreciate you not choosing condescending language.
    LOL, it's a condescending thread (not that there's anything terribly wrong with that) designed not to provoke discussion, but rather to inflame emotions. Looks like it worked.

    By the way, there is a difference between condescension and sarcasm. Sarcasm is usually obvious to everyone while condescension is oftentimes in the eyes of the beholder.
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,750
    Alan, I am practicing the respect I hope for in all exchanges on this forum. Mocking me & laughing at my request is a huge deterrent to me to engaging with you. If we were in person, perhaps you would have been able to see my affect, which was disappointment at the language you chose. Is it possible for all of us to frame this conversation in adult language?

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    2,175
    Quote Originally Posted by iris lilies View Post
    The last time this came up during the last state doing the same thing, didn't we conclude that Planned Parenthood does transvaginal ultrasounds before abortions? This was a quote from their rep a little more than a year ago:

    That’s just the medical standard,” said Adrienne Schreiber, an official at Planned Parenthood’s Washington, D.C., regional office. “To confirm the gestational age of the pregnancy, before any procedure is done, you do an ultrasound.”


    She goes on to say later that if the woman is uncomfortable with the transvaginal ultrasound, she's going to be less than delighted with the actual abortion procedure which is even MORE invasive and "miserable."
    The medical standard doesn't currently include requiring the ultrasound technician to provide a detailed description of everything they see in detail as they are doing the procedure.

    It does open some interesting doors - with government mandated medical procedures on the books, what others could be mandated?

  10. #10
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    10,062
    Quote Originally Posted by redfox View Post
    Alan, I am practicing the respect I hope for in all exchanges on this forum. Mocking me & laughing at my request is a huge deterrent to me to engaging with you. If we were in person, perhaps you would have been able to see my affect, which was disappointment at the language you chose.
    Redfox, I don't want to hurt your feelings by disagreeing with you, but do you honestly believe that you didn't single me out because of my use of the term "War on Wimmenses", while deliberately ignoring "Republican Sharia Law" & "Tea Party Taliban"? If you are honestly practicing respect, you would have been disappointed in both so please forgive me for seeing this as nothing more than an attempt to silence those you may perceive to be ideological rivals.

    Often, there is a place for irreverance and friendly sarcasm, especially in threads such as this. I'm sorry you don't agree.

    I'm also sorry to be forced to respond to this sort of thing publicly. My sincerest apologies to our membership.
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •