I think maybe you have hit on something...if we could provide for a minimum level of healthcare, much like social security or medicare, then that would solve the problem for those that insist on being able to get better/the best of care for themselves at a premium. I doubt that many people would disagree with that philosophy - until they were about to die - then that is when the death panels would kick in!!
Peace
I agree that Medicare is a good model. And, I do not want to be kept alive in a nursing home. When I get to that point, I hope they LET me die. When I reach the place where I can get no better and cannot take care of my basic needs I do not want to be alive.
You need to make your wishes known and train up your family or whoever is acting in that stead that's what you want. Your phrase "I hope" makes you sound as though you have no say in the matter. You do.
thank you, Iris Lily, good point
Back to the most basic of policy questions... Is there any reason expanding Medicare would not accomplish almost all of the goals of healthcare reform, probably for less cost? I'm starting to like pcooley's suggestion regarding a basic universal plan.
According to the L.A. Times, repealing the health reform bill would cost $230 billion. Implementing the cut-as-you-go policy might be a bit sticky in this case.
That's what that Yossarian guy was pushing on the old forum. Basic universal care, either through a single payer system, a voucher/subsidy arrangement or a tax credit for opting out, but preserving the private market for services above the basic level. The fear is of course the basic level keeps getting increased unitl it crowds out the private market so all we have left is the postal service running healthcare. You'd like to think we're smarter than that but....
Enjoy the strawberry.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)