Page 90 of 111 FirstFirst ... 40808889909192100 ... LastLast
Results 891 to 900 of 1106

Thread: Trumps: White Angry Middleclass

  1. #891
    Senior Member bae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Offshore
    Posts
    11,969
    Interesting article on Ford that just popped into my mailbox this morning:

    http://priceonomics.com/henry-fords-...a-great-again/

  2. #892
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,869
    It is an interesting question. As technology advances, and it becomes increasingly cheaper to substitute capital for labor, what do we do with the people whose labor isn't valuable enough to support them?

    Some form of a dole?

    Government-funded make-work?

    Mandating a certain level of inefficiency into the economy to force firms to use labor where technology would be cheaper?

    Soylent Green?

    It will be interesting, if somewhat heart-breaking, to see how we solve the problem.

  3. #893
    Senior Member Teacher Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    12,889
    WS: tool and dye makers used to make the big bucks in Wi. My ex made great $ and got lots of overtime. It supported the 5 of us and allowed me to get 3 college degrees all paid for in cash. We lived frugally but owned a decent home/cars, etc. He always worked for the big companies and when he was laid off he would go work at a smaller place that didn't pay as well and wait to get called back to the bigger place. He was never out of a job more then a week. I suspect you guys are living in a small town which might be why his pay is low. There is a shortage of real tool and dye makers that have been through the 4 year apprenticeship program. Manufacturing jobs allowed people that did not go to college to have middle class life styles and yes Ford understood his workers couldn't buy his cars if not paid enough. You don't have to be greedy to be rich.

  4. #894
    Senior Member Ultralight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    10,216
    Quote Originally Posted by Teacher Terry View Post
    Ford understood his workers couldn't buy his cars if not paid enough. You don't have to be greedy to be rich.
    Am I really the only one here who thinks this mythical Ford economic model does not make sense?

  5. #895
    Senior Member bae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Offshore
    Posts
    11,969
    Quote Originally Posted by UltraliteAngler View Post
    Am I really the only one here who thinks this mythical Ford economic model does not make sense?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-so_story

  6. #896
    Senior Member Teacher Terry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    12,889
    I grew up in a blue collar manufacturing town and people made decent $ at their jobs. Often the wife didn't work and men made enough to support a decent lifestyle. Not a grand lifestyle but decent.

  7. #897
    Senior Member Ultralight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    10,216
    This link safe for work?

  8. #898
    Senior Member bae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Offshore
    Posts
    11,969
    Quote Originally Posted by UltraliteAngler View Post
    This link safe for work?
    Some job sites prohibit Kipling, so be careful.

  9. #899
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    2,175
    Quote Originally Posted by UltraliteAngler View Post
    Am I really the only one here who thinks this mythical Ford economic model does not make sense?
    Welfare capitalism - Endicott-Johnson shoe company and IBM (once upon a time) followed this model (my father was employed by IBM in the 60's). It worked for a time - eventually it just could not compete with businesses who could cut their labor costs to the bone by relocating overseas.

  10. #900
    Williamsmith
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by bae View Post
    My words were pretty simple and clear. Only one word even had two syllables, and that one was a "contraction".

    Some jobs don't generate $15 of value/utility. Such as punching your order into the order screen at KFC. So if you require $15/hour for that task, the task is quite likely to end up getting performed by some other less-expensive means.

    I was travelling the past 3-4 weeks. I stopped at a McDonalds the other day, and the fellow behind the counter at the non-busy restaurant took about 5 minutes to punch in the order for my family of three, and we were each ordering simply "meal #X" off the screen above his head - nothing complex. I could have placed our order in about 5 seconds on a touchscreen or phone app myself. I suspect at a mandated $15/hour, in a few years that's how food will get ordered at such places.

    Heck, they'll probably invent burger-flipping robots too. Oh wait, I seem to recall that they have.

    I'm curious, why is $15 the magic number? Why not $12? Or $50?
    The folks at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, otherwise known as MIT have studied what it costs people in different parts of the country to live. They have defined a living wage for full time workers and then classified the hourly rate in three categories....living wage, poverty wage and current minimum wage. I live in one of the cheapest counties in the nation except for gasoline which is the highest due to our crumbling infrastructure of bridges on highways.

    So in my county one person should earn $9.40/ hr for a living wage...$5 / HR for poverty and the current minimum wage is $7.25. Contrast with San Fransisco.....$14.37/ hr for a living wage ....$5 poverty and current is $9. They even have it broken down in expense categories to justify their numbers.

    Now that is just one person. Say they have to support one child. California becomes $29.37/ hr for living wage, $7 for poverty and $9 is the current.

    My county, $20.14 living, poverty $7 and current is $7.25.

    Im no genius but the folks at MIT usually know what they are doing with numbers.

    My way of thinking, if you can't pay somebody enou to live decently then you shouldn't be claiming to be a decent businessman. Admit it, your business model sucks.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •