Page 22 of 32 FirstFirst ... 122021222324 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 316

Thread: Prayapolooza in Houston

  1. #211
    Senior Member peggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,857
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg View Post
    My own kids grew up with a gay uncle so its a no brainer for them. Several of their friends did not have anyone so close who was gay. Even so, I have yet to hear any person from that group (now up to age 27 or so) ever question that gays should have all the IDENTICAL rights and privileges that any of the rest of us do. Note: IDENTICAL, not special. Those friends are from a very wide demographic. The primary thread they all share as a link is education. Most of them met in school and most continued through college and beyond or are still there. Since it usually stands that our leaders are well educated I am quite hopeful that discrimination for something over which the individual has no control is quickly dying on the vine. The new up-and-coming leaders of this country will have other issues that need their undivided attention.
    +1

  2. #212
    poetry_writer
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by loosechickens View Post
    Catwoman.....you are perfectly entitled to your opinion. About anything. But if your viewpoint is to see gay rights and equality for gays, including the very basic right to enjoy the benefits of marriage the same as any other citizen, as something that gays are being manipulated into by "the left" for their own political reasons, you are going to find yourself in an ever decreasing minority. The country has moved on, just as it moved on in the question of civil rights for African-Americans.

    I am old enough to have traveled in the south when there were "colored" bathrooms and water fountains. My own mother thought she was VERY enlightened because when they were home alone, she sat in the kitchen and had lunch with the maid. My grandmother called black people "darkies", and my very religious uncle pitched a fit when a black couple showed up to sit in HIS church.

    Those were VERY common attitudes among whites in those days. Honestly, when I was young, I don't even remember QUESTIONING that the black people couldn't use the public swimming pool, and I was in junior high when schools were integrated after Brown vs. the Board of Education, although in the case in our school, it meant only that two very frightened young black girls came to our school, and when I talked to them in the lunchroom, I was ostracized by my other friends.

    TIMES CHANGE......and they don't change evenly, or at a pace where the people who ARE in the privileged group think is appropriate or in line with their beliefs and views. And sometimes those people would like to pretend that the desire for change, and the push toward politicizing that change, which is necessary for it to happen, is something that some group (on the opposite political side of the abyss) is manipulating people who would otherwise be satisfied with the status quo, for their own reasons.

    As Kib says.......this is fast becoming a moot point, especially with young people. Attitudes about gays and lesbians are almost polar opposites in the under 35 as opposed to the over 50 demographics. Demographics, if nothing else, will turn the old ideas of how gays should live, and what they should be "satisfied" to have on its head.

    The attitudes displayed by the Christian fundamentalist right about gays are fast becoming obsolete. As is the long used refrain "but the Bible agrees with ME", when used to discriminate, just as it was used to support slavery, Jim Crow laws and all the other ways that a dominant group found to discriminate against others. Sorry.....that's just how it is.

    edited to add: Gregg is correct.....you are to be commended for hanging in there on this discussion when you find yourself in such a minority. It's hard to be the person that many other are disagreeing with......I've found myself in that situation more than once, and it's not fun.

    Sorry you encountered racist attitudes in your family. Its very disheartening. Do you consider all Christians to be fundamentalist wackos? Your post seems to say so. Correct me if I am wrong. Do you routinely ask people about their sexual orientation? Do you think all Christians hate gays? I know I am tossing out a lot of questions, but I would be interested in hearing your reply. Thank you.

  3. #213
    Senior Member peggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,857
    Quote Originally Posted by Catwoman View Post
    What is civil about responding to someone's post with what amounts to an accusation of bigotry? If she had directly called me a name - then would you have done something about it? The comparison to my views with slave-holding southerners in "Gone With the Wind" is again the cattiest, least profitable remark one can possibly make. Did that make a contribution to this discussion other than to make Peggy feel as if she sits in the morally superior postion and sneers down at the less-enlightened southerner? Usually these discussions are good for thought. Apparently I need some anti-venin cuz I have been snake-bit. You are right personal attacks do not add to the discussion, they shut it down. It could have been enlightening but it just stung - and not from truth - from viciousness.
    Oh chill out! Step back, take a breath, and invite one of those 'good friends' over for a cup of coffee and have a heart to heart. If you are such good friends as you think, they will appreciate it more than you can imagine. A good friend might start with something like, "people keep saying gays are discriminated against. Are you? I really want to know because what affects my good friends affects me. What is important to my good friends is important to me."
    Try that, then get back with us.

    Oh and I will ignore your insults and calls for censure. I realize you feel very, very, VERY strongly about this. In view of this society and how it's changing, you're wrong, of course, but that doesn't change your feelings and I can accept that.
    You find an accusation of bigotry insulting? Well, I find actual bigotry insulting.

    I 'll tell you one thing though. It is heartening to see how many different people of different ages, from all walks of life, represented by the folks on this board, are tired of the bigotry and discrimination. It tells me that it won't be long before we will look back on this time and wonder what ever took us so long. Like granting rights to blacks and women.
    My beautiful daughter thanks you all.

  4. #214
    Senior Member Catwoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    SoTx.
    Posts
    222
    Thanks Peggy. I assume you speak on behalf of the forum with your "Try that and get back to us." advice. There is nothing I could say to you right now that would be appropriate. The smug arrogance with which you dispense advice must be a comfort to you. Enjoy.

  5. #215
    Senior Member peggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,857
    Quote Originally Posted by alan View Post
    You mis-interpret me. Rights are not granted, they are inalienable. Entitlements are granted, and laws which take away freedom of choice, freedom of association and freedom of expression are heinous. Simply declaring something a right doesn't make it so IMHO.

    Any group which attempts to use the legal system to grant themselves an entitlement or take away others freedom of association and expression will find resistance. It is a hard task to undo thousands of years of social convention in the course of a generation or two and anyone or any organization who labels those who don't get on board soon enough as haters, racists, etc., do their cause a dis-service.
    I know we've had this discussion before Alan, what is a right. I still believe rights are something that is granted by your society/group/clan whatever. Nothing is inalienable, which means it is unable to be taken away or transferred. I guess a few things are inalienable, like your intelligence or your personality. Those things can't be transferred or taken away. (ok maybe with the use of drugs, but that's getting into a strange and grey area) who your parents are is inalienable.
    But life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness can absolutely be taken away. Or granted. Even life itself isn't inalienable in that the next bigger, stronger one can come and snuff yours out.
    We, as a civilized society, came together and decided which rights we, the citizens, would enjoy. Life, of course. Murder is against the law, our laws. Liberty, sure. If you haven't murdered. Then you lose your liberty. The pursuit of happiness. That's a tough one, with lots of qualifiers. Those who are drowning in debt from a catastrophic illness aren't at liberty to pursue happiness. Gays who only want to marry the one they love aren't allowed to pursue this very basic happiness. We have inalienable rights because WE said they were, which kind of cancels out the inalienable part. But, this is an old discussion for another thread.

    Change is hard, but sometimes necessary. And sometimes it's necessary to drag the last 'defenders' kicking and screaming into the next reality. Cause if we just wait for them, then nothing will happen. It's time. This is going to happen, and we, the people, have said it will be so.

    This politician, who wants to lead and write legislation, and make laws, aligning himself with this hate group is George Wallace standing in the school house door.

  6. #216
    Senior Member Gingerella72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Nebraska, USA
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg View Post
    There are several people in my life that I consider friends who happen to be gay, a few of them I've met through my brother who is also gay. I've never had any problem posing any question to them and they certainly have no problem discussing the gay topic du jour with me. In fact gay (rights) issues often make up a significant portion of our conversation. What I can not imagine is having someone you care about in your life who is gay and NOT spending time discussing these topics. I guess "friend" is a subjective term with a different meaning to everyone.

    On a related note, my brother turned me on to a story of a group of clergy in my very conservative home state of Nebraska. It seems more than 100 ordained (Christian) ministers have signed a proclamation stating that they do not believe homosexuality is a sin. One of the signers, a Rev. Eric Elnes, said, "We believe homosexuality is not a sin. It’s not a birth defect or a choice. God created people this way. And if God created them this way, they need to be honored for who they are, and fully included in church life and wider society". I don't know how you could say it any better than that. I am VERY proud that a group with such an enlightened view was able to put this together in Nebraska. It should give hope to all y'all down there in Te-jas. Here is a link to the story...

    http://www.ketv.com/r/28214658/detail.html?taf=oma
    As another fellow Cornhusker this makes me very, very glad to learn! Thank you for sharing, Gregg. I can only hope that the rest of Nebraska clergy feels this way and not only the "more enlightened big city Omaha clergy."

  7. #217
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,528
    "Sorry you encountered racist attitudes in your family. Its very disheartening. Do you consider all Christians to be fundamentalist wackos? Your post seems to say so. Correct me if I am wrong. Do you routinely ask people about their sexual orientation? Do you think all Christians hate gays? I know I am tossing out a lot of questions, but I would be interested in hearing your reply. Thank you." (poetry_writer)
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The racial attitudes expressed in my family (and in many, many white families in the fifties.......remember the "white flight" to the suburbs, to get away from "THEM"?) were very common at the time. With time, my family's attitudes changed. My father was one of the first in his business to hire and promote minority managers, which was a huge step forward for him. My mother grew and changed, began to see the error of seeing African-Americans as somehow "less than" she and her family and friends, although, sadly, my grandmother, even in her last illness, embarassed us all by pitching a fit because she was placed in a room in the hospital with a black woman (who, luckily had far more grace and dignity than my grandmother), died without changing her viewpoints. My uncle came to accept black families in his church, and his son, who became a Lutheran minister, not only worked for civil rights, but has never shown prejudice and has friends of all races, religions and sexual orientation.

    SO....it is possible to change, although change is hard, and seems to come more easily to the young than to those who are very set in their ways.

    And, of course I don't think all Christians "hate gays". I'm not even sure that very bigoted fundamentalist Christians "hate" them, but rather, fear them, fear that somehow their own families will be "sullied" by the "sinfulness", etc., which makes gays and lesbians who grow up in fundamentalist Christian families have a hard row to hoe, but many, many Christians, as they were in the matter of civil rights for African-Americans, not only accept, but support equality for gays, marriage for gays, and full civil rights, as they would support for anyone else.

    To me, (and you may disagree), it is not the "Christianness" that is the problem, it is the fundamentalist, black and white thinking, which is really no different in many ways from the black and white thinking of the Muslim fundamentalists and the Taliban, or those of any other religion who hold absolute, "my way or the highway" viewpoints, and use passages from religious books to reinforce and amplify their prejudices. (Although, conveniently ignoring other passages, with which they do not agree).

    I don't "routinely" ask people their sexual orientation, and honestly don't need to, as most gay and lesbian people, and straight people, for that matter, are open as to their orientation, making it obvious, as we get to know them. I'm sure that I know people very peripherally that I have no idea whether or not they are gay or straight, but most people that I actually KNOW, it's an open acknowledgement and knowledge, and people are accepted for themselves, with gayness or straightness just one more aspect of their personhood, not necessarily the defining factor, any more than my straightness is a defining factor for me.....just part of who I am.

    Here's what I think. I think that people who have fears and prejudices (and yes, extending into bigotry sometimes), have a tendency to look to their religion, for example, to buttress what they already believe. So, some Christians, having fears and dislike of gays, or fears about their "sinfulness" (and that it might, somehow, be "catching"), look in the Bible, search the Old Testament, and say, "see.....see......the Bible agrees with me!". (there was someone famous one time who said, "isn't it amazing that people's gods all seem to have the same prejudices that they have?").

    The fact that they consider themselves followers of Jesus, and Jesus had absolutely nothing to say about homosexuality, and a great deal to say about accepting one's brothers and sisters, and loving all people, caring for the poor, etc., doesn't seem to compute. Only the words in the Old Testament that reinforce their own prejudices are used for buttressing their argument.

    They don't boycott the Red Lobster because people are in there eating shellfish, or think that people should be put to death for not honoring the sabbath, or disrespecting their parents. They don't believe it is o.k. to sell their daughters into slavery, etc. All things that are in that same Old Testament, but are things they no longer believe. But the things that are in the Old Testament that agree with their own feelings are somehow sacrosanct. It doesn't make sense.

    Which is why attitudes are changing, because the religious arguments against gay rights and gay marriage have no more basis in fact than forbidding marriage between races, or using the bible to justify Jim Crow laws in the south back in the day, or slavery (because it was in the bible) even earlier.

    Prejudices die hard....it takes awhile. But they never change unless we go through these uncomfortable times, upset some sacred applecarts, and finally, have the last generation that still holds the prejudices to move onto their next appointed existence. That is slowly happening with African-Americans......(who, born during WWII, and growing up before civil rights, could have believed back in the fifties that we would elect a mixed race President?), and attitudes of racial prejudice are far more prevalent in older people than in younger ones. It's the same with sexual orientation....older people, especially people of a specifically fundamentalist religious belief, have a very hard time with it, but younger people see it as almost a "non-event", and have a hard time even imagining why gay people even have to fight for their rights, such as being able to marry the person they love, or in areas like serving in our military, where gays have ALWAYS served, even if closeted, and where pretty much every other democratic country in the world has been having them serve openly for a long time. We're really in the backwater in that area, too.

    I go on and on, but I hope I've answered your questions. Change is harder for some people than for others, and some cling to old prejudices long past the time to have laid them down. But time will solve the problem. That, and people being willing to stand up for justice, civil rights and fairness. It is, after all, the American Way.
    Last edited by loosechickens; 6-17-11 at 11:53pm.

  8. #218
    poetry_writer
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by loosechickens View Post
    "Sorry you encountered racist attitudes in your family. Its very disheartening. Do you consider all Christians to be fundamentalist wackos? Your post seems to say so. Correct me if I am wrong. Do you routinely ask people about their sexual orientation? Do you think all Christians hate gays? I know I am tossing out a lot of questions, but I would be interested in hearing your reply. Thank you." (poetry_writer)
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The racial attitudes expressed in my family (and in many, many white families in the fifties.......remember the "white flight" to the suburbs, to get away from "THEM"?) were very common at the time. With time, my family's attitudes changed. My father was one of the first in his business to hire and promote minority managers, which was a huge step forward for him. My mother grew and changed, began to see the error of seeing African-Americans as somehow "less than" she and her family and friends, although, sadly, my grandmother, even in her last illness, embarassed us all by pitching a fit because she was placed in a room in the hospital with a black woman (who, luckily had far more grace and dignity than my grandmother), died without changing her viewpoints. My uncle came to accept black families in his church, and his son, who became a Lutheran minister, not only worked for civil rights, but has never shown prejudice and has friends of all races, religions and sexual orientation.

    SO....it is possible to change, although change is hard, and seems to come more easily to the young than to those who are very set in their ways.

    And, of course I don't think all Christians "hate gays". I'm not even sure that very bigoted fundamentalist Christians "hate" them, but rather, fear them, fear that somehow their own families will be "sullied" by the "sinfulness", etc., which makes gays and lesbians who grow up in fundamentalist Christian families have a hard row to hoe, but many, many Christians, as they were in the matter of civil rights for African-Americans, not only accept, but support equality for gays, marriage for gays, and full civil rights, as they would support for anyone else.

    To me, (and you may disagree), it is not the "Christianness" that is the problem, it is the fundamentalist, black and white thinking, which is really no different in many ways from the black and white thinking of the Muslim fundamentalists and the Taliban, or those of any other religion who hold absolute, "my way or the highway" viewpoints, and use passages from religious books to reinforce and amplify their prejudices. (Although, conveniently ignoring other passages, with which they do not agree).

    I don't "routinely" ask people their sexual orientation, and honestly don't need to, as most gay and lesbian people, and straight people, for that matter, are open as to their orientation, making it obvious, as we get to know them. I'm sure that I know people very peripherally that I have no idea whether or not they are gay or straight, but most people that I actually KNOW, it's an open acknowledgement and knowledge, and people are accepted for themselves, with gayness or straightness just one more aspect of their personhood, not necessarily the defining factor, any more than my straightness is a defining factor for me.....just part of who I am.

    Here's what I think. I think that people who have fears and prejudices (and yes, extending into bigotry sometimes), have a tendency to look to their religion, for example, to buttress what they already believe. So, some Christians, having fears and dislike of gays, or fears about their "sinfulness" (and that it might, somehow, be "catching"), look in the Bible, search the Old Testament, and say, "see.....see......the Bible agrees with me!". (there was someone famous one time who said, "isn't it amazing that people's gods all seem to have the same prejudices that they have?").

    The fact that they consider themselves followers of Jesus, and Jesus had absolutely nothing to say about homosexuality, and a great deal to say about accepting one's brothers and sisters, and loving all people, caring for the poor, etc., doesn't seem to compute. Only the words in the Old Testament that reinforce their own prejudices are used for buttressing their argument.

    They don't boycott the Red Lobster because people are in there eating shellfish, or think that people should be put to death for not honoring the sabbath, or disrespecting their parents. They don't believe it is o.k. to sell their daughters into slavery, etc. All things that are in that same Old Testament, but are things they no longer believe. But the things that are in the Old Testament that agree with their own feelings are somehow sacrosanct. It doesn't make sense.

    Which is why attitudes are changing, because the religious arguments against gay rights and gay marriage have no more basis in fact than forbidding marriage between races, or using the bible to justify Jim Crow laws in the south back in the day, or slavery (because it was in the bible) even earlier.

    Prejudices die hard....it takes awhile. But they never change unless we go through these uncomfortable times, upset some sacred applecarts, and finally, have the last generation that still holds the prejudices to move onto their next appointed existence. That is slowly happening with African-Americans......(who, born during WWII, and growing up before civil rights, could have believed back in the fifties that we would elect a mixed race President?), and attitudes of racial prejudice are far more prevalent in older people than in younger ones. It's the same with sexual orientation....older people, especially people of a specifically fundamentalist religious belief, have a very hard time with it, but younger people see it as almost a "non-event", and have a hard time even imagining why gay people even have to fight for their rights, such as being able to marry the person they love, or in areas like serving in our military, where gays have ALWAYS served, even if closeted, and where pretty much every other democratic country in the world has been having them serve openly for a long time. We're really in the backwater in that area, too.

    I go on and on, but I hope I've answered your questions. Change is harder for some people than for others, and some cling to old prejudices long past the time to have laid them down. But time will solve the problem. That, and people being willing to stand up for justice, civil rights and fairness. It is, after all, the American Way.
    Have you met any atheistic or agnostics kooks or just Christians? I seldom see it mentioned but I have indeed met atheistic nutballs.

  9. #219
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,528
    "Well, even if my viewpoint is becoming obsolete...there are still a few Jews who keep kosher...I'm good with being a minority") (catwoman)

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    And that's fine. And, so long as those Jews don't try to paint others, who are not even Jewish as "sinful", "unnatural", or dangerous if they don't keep kosher, too, and so long as they don't try to influence the passage of legislation that would force people who are not Jewish to adjust their eating habits to conform to said Jewish peoples' idea of what is correct, in accordance "with G-d's wishes", etc., they'll get no argument from me.

  10. #220
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,528
    "Have you met any atheistic or agnostics kooks or just Christians? I seldom see it mentioned but I have indeed met atheistic nutballs." (poetry_writer)

    ---------------------------------------------------

    Of course.....alas, "nutballs" come in every religious persuasion, including no religion at all, or doubters. They come in all sizes, races, religions, sexes and every other way you can slice and dice the human race into groups.

    At the moment, in issues regarding gays and lesbians in this country, the very fundamentalist Christian "nutballs" are in the public eye. But that doesn't mean that "nutballs" don't exist in other religions and in people with no religion at all, and everywhere. Not to worry. And even large number of Christians do not believe what the Christian "nutballs" as you call them, believe.

    I don't think ANYONE, really, is a "nutball". I think sometimes people have very rigid thinking, lots of fears and anxieties, and act out those fears by trying to control the world around them, including others in that world. It isn't enough for them to hold a view that something is wrong, and therefore endeavor themselves not to do or be what they think is awful, but feel the need to reach out and make sure that others aren't able to do or be, as well.

    Large, large numbers of Christian people, Christian pastors and other leaders, theological thinkers, etc., do not agree with the fundamentalist Christian outlook on gay people as portrayed by organizations like The American Family Association. Many Christians are working hard for equality for gays and lesbians, and some denominations are supportive of gay marriage, etc.

    Don't try to see "Christians" as monolithic, because they are not. Mainstream Christians are probably larger in numbers, but not as vocal as the ones spreading misinformation and bigotry regarding gays. Sometimes the loudest voices are who are heard, not the ones from the deepest thinkers or the ones who have really taken the teachings of Christ to heart. JMHO
    Last edited by loosechickens; 6-18-11 at 3:36pm.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •