Page 18 of 19 FirstFirst ... 816171819 LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 189

Thread: Why O won and R lost?

  1. #171
    Helper Gregg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Macondo (or is that my condo?)
    Posts
    4,015
    "Man can never be free until the last king is hung with the entrails of the last priest."

    Louisa Mae Alcott


    (Hint: sometimes what is said is more important than who said it.)
    "Back when I was a young boy all my aunts and uncles would poke me in the ribs at weddings saying your next! Your next! They stopped doing all that crap when I started doing it to them... at funerals!"

  2. #172
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    9,843
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg View Post
    There is a chicken / egg element to this (not that it really matters). I'm not sure if the bribery from Congress came first or if the members were simply responding to the demands of the people. A quote from Alexis de Tocqueville seems to work pretty well in conjunction with Mr. Franklin's idea.
    Oh I"m not trying to lay blame to one over the other, just to point out that the long decline into a pure democracy has probably been attained. The tyranny of the majority is in full bloom.
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

  3. #173
    Helper Gregg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Macondo (or is that my condo?)
    Posts
    4,015
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan View Post
    The tyranny of the majority is in full bloom.
    Agreed. +1
    "Back when I was a young boy all my aunts and uncles would poke me in the ribs at weddings saying your next! Your next! They stopped doing all that crap when I started doing it to them... at funerals!"

  4. #174
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    9,681
    I only wish it was the case, I think it might be less viscious and have better outcomes, though there are no guarantees. Direct democracy shows some degree of self-correction, can you say the same about the politicos? Like 3 strikes law, a bad law implemented by direct democracy, not before much damage was done, but it was just corrected by the people of California.

    But beyond state level direct democracy, in no way do I see government policy reflecting what most people would directly vote for. Trade agreements that outsource their jobs much less secret trade agreements? War with Libya? Yea I know there was a great people's movement just busting down the barricades of the white house lawn for war with Libya. Vast data centers to spy on their emails? Help for the banksters? It takes no idealization of mass opinion at all (which is often easily enough swayed by propaganda, by which I mean advertising), to say that this machine is a viscious system that twists the people's will in it's gears, into unrecognizable policy.
    Trees don't grow on money

  5. #175
    Senior Member freein05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Calaveras Big Trees, California
    Posts
    705
    As one of the majority this time I take offence. Bush 2 did not even win with the popular vote and he was my president. We have the electoral college to protect minorities. By the way how does it feel to be a minority? Next thing we will have is Republican only toilets and drinking fountains.

  6. #176
    Senior Member The Storyteller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Rural Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,145
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan View Post
    The tyranny of the majority is in full bloom.


    "There are too many books in the world to read in a single lifetime; you have to draw the line somewhere." --Diane Setterfield, The Thirteenth Tale

  7. #177
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    9,843
    Quote Originally Posted by The Storyteller View Post
    An oldie but a goodie for sure, although I'm not sure how you can judge what I think it means without first having a discussion on the subject.

    I do realize that no meaningful discussions are necessary in today's political environment in order to establish and promote a meme, however enlightening it might be. C'est la vie
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

  8. #178
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    9,681
    It seems implausible on the face of it that elections in which billions of dollars are spent, in which the money is hard to even trace, in which candidates HAVE TO pander to this money, somehow represent majority will rather than being at least somewhat influenced by the will of well ... the money. But I suppose one could argue, sure those with millions to give (mostly corporations) give millions of dollars to our politicians, but still the politicians REALLY seek only to serve the people and what the majority want them to. But that seems a hard case to make.

    So here's one way to go about it: you could try to show strong correlation between what polls show people want and the policies we actually get to show strong alignment (yep people are getting exactly what they want ... mob rule gone made). ONLY, I've heard of many polls showing the opposite, the American people are more isolationist (don't want world military involvement), the American people would happily have marijuana legalization (but can only get it at state levels when they have DIRECT DEMOCRACY and the Feds will fight this legalization). Might the American people want true socialized medicine (not Obamacare) as well? I've heard so, I don't know.
    Trees don't grow on money

  9. #179
    Senior Member The Storyteller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Rural Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,145
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan View Post
    An oldie but a goodie for sure, although I'm not sure how you can judge what I think it means without first having a discussion on the subject.
    Oh, so now you are expecting a discussion on a subject. I thought we were now at the point of dismissing one another using amusing quips, clips, and pics.
    "There are too many books in the world to read in a single lifetime; you have to draw the line somewhere." --Diane Setterfield, The Thirteenth Tale

  10. #180
    Senior Member The Storyteller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Rural Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,145
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg View Post
    "Man can never be free until the last king is hung with the entrails of the last priest."

    Louisa Mae Alcott


    (Hint: sometimes what is said is more important than who said it.)
    Then what is the point of attribution if not to lend weight?
    "There are too many books in the world to read in a single lifetime; you have to draw the line somewhere." --Diane Setterfield, The Thirteenth Tale

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •