Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Secretary of State

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    645
    That is indeed the Secretary of State's job. We haven't had a time during my lifetime when American interests were not in some way in danger overseas, so there has never been a legitimate reason for the Secretary of State to spend much time in the United States.

    The job of the Secretary of State has gotten incredibly more difficult, mostly since the nations that the American interests previously would casually exploit with impunity have made clear that they'll take American lives if the United States engages in such transgressive behavior now. The proliferation of insurgency tactics, first used to great effect by the Viet Cong, has undercut the value of the rabid bullying the United States has typically used to subjugate other nations to its will. (Incidentally, this accounts for a good portion of the dampening of upside potential for the American economy, which in turn accounts for some of the efforts we have seen in recent decades to secure the stream of excessive economic upside enjoyed by some in our society through what can be seen as something analogous to bullying tactics within the American economy itself. It makes sense that excessive prosperity, which was once secured through bullying tactics which become less effective, would be sought using similar tactics applied where insurgency is less viable as a counter-measure.) Some American Presidents choose to ignore how the bullying tactics they employ foster later insurgency reprisals, and others don't, which accounts for some variability with regard to the difficulty of the Secretary of State's work. Clearly, American interests are in somewhat less danger just after some bullying action followed by far greater danger after the immediate intimidation effect wears off, greatly increasing the difficultly of the job.

    A tangential thought about the concerns about carbon footprint of a single person flying around the world on diplomatic missions: News I read this week posits that the pollution associated with being a meat eater is greater than that of being an airline passenger. I'm not sure if that would be true of someone who flies as much as the Secretary of State should, but by the same token, I believe Biden has cut down his consumption of beef.

  2. #12
    Helper Gregg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Macondo (or is that my condo?)
    Posts
    4,015
    I agree with the notion that Sec of State is a grooming regimen for those with higher aspirations (or probably more accurately for those for whom the puppet masters have higher aspirations). Its a natural fit in that no other office has more opportunity to meet and greet so many heads of state or to keep their names rolling off the tongues of the mass media talking heads. The travel thing is just...meh. I am no fan of JK, but that has everything to do with the fact that I perceive him as completely ineffectual and nothing to do with his carbon footprint.
    "Back when I was a young boy all my aunts and uncles would poke me in the ribs at weddings saying your next! Your next! They stopped doing all that crap when I started doing it to them... at funerals!"

  3. #13
    Senior Member Packy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,187
    I haven't noticed anything unusual with respect to that, but you are probably correct.

  4. #14
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    28,698
    I keep thinking of the National Review's characterization of Hilary's last bit as Sec of State. I love National Review's "The Week" column for it's tone, the turn of phrase, the pointed observations. Anyway, NR said about Hil's stint:

    She was predictably dishonest, but surprisingly incompetent.

    I think that's hilarious.

  5. #15
    Senior Member Yossarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Margaritaville
    Posts
    898
    Quote Originally Posted by Gregg View Post
    I agree with the notion that Sec of State is a grooming regimen for those with higher aspirations (or probably more accurately for those for whom the puppet masters have higher aspirations). Its a natural fit in that no other office has more opportunity to meet and greet so many heads of state or to keep their names rolling off the tongues of the mass media talking heads.
    Who was the last guy that worked out for, James Buchanan?

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,269
    Quote Originally Posted by iris lilies View Post
    I keep thinking of the National Review's characterization of Hilary's last bit as Sec of State. I love National Review's "The Week" column for it's tone, the turn of phrase, the pointed observations. Anyway, NR said about Hil's stint:

    She was predictably dishonest, but surprisingly incompetent.

    I think that's hilarious.
    What do they have to say about John Kerry?

  7. #17
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    28,698
    Quote Originally Posted by Florence View Post
    What do they have to say about John Kerry?
    I don't know, he hasn't had his Bengazhi moment. I'll keep an eye out for commentary on him and will let you know.

  8. #18
    Helper Gregg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Macondo (or is that my condo?)
    Posts
    4,015
    Quote Originally Posted by Yossarian View Post
    Who was the last guy that worked out for, James Buchanan?
    Big difference between higher aspirations and winning an election. Enough of a difference to make me believe that our system isn't completely corrupt, but that's another thread...
    "Back when I was a young boy all my aunts and uncles would poke me in the ribs at weddings saying your next! Your next! They stopped doing all that crap when I started doing it to them... at funerals!"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •