Sorry loosechickens, I simply thought that if someone familiar with the Chronicle found the tone of the article mentioned to be contrary to the newspapers editorial slant, it may be because the article didn't come from the paper proper, but rather from a blog hosted by the paper, which seems reasonable to me considering that the Chronicle logo appears nowhere on the posted link.Originally Posted by loosechickens
I have no interest in smearing you, even though at various times you've referred to me as a trouble maker, pot stirrer and rabble rouser and then just recently referred to my sincere efforts to form a more collegial relationship with you as being disrespectful of you. Based upon my being banned from the old forum within minutes of being critical of your over-reaction to another poster and then seeing what happened to the last poster to raise your ire on the new site, I think I know better than most what it means to attract undue attention.
I'm sorry if I've unintentionally contributed to your feelings of being disrespected. I can assure you that I know better than that.
Reply With Quote