
Originally Posted by
Alan
As I understand it, Borrower A may or may not pay higher mortgage fees than Borrower B, it will now depend upon a variety of factors such as credit score, loan to value, debt to income and loan purpose, etc., which can change a borrower's basis points by 100 or more.
In a theoretical estimation I saw from a mortgage broker online, someone applying for a $400,000 mortgage with a credit score of 740 and 20% cash down payment would see their fees increase from around $2000 to about $3500. Someone applying for the same mortgage amount with a credit score of 640 and 3% cash down payment would see their fees decrease from around $11,000 to about $6,000. A borrower with a credit rating in the 500's may see their fees decreased even more as there seems to be a matrix involved that scores those borrowers in order to come up with an appropriate fee, although I've not seen it published anywhere.
So, Borrower A wouldn't necessarily pay more in mortgage fees than Borrower B, but would certainly be paying more in order to subsidize Borrower B. It's called a loan level pricing adjustment, but it's historically been better known as Robbing From Peter To Pay Paul.
I enjoy a credit rating in the mid 830's. If I were Borrower A in the theoretical I mentioned, I wonder how much higher my increase might be?