Page 12 of 38 FirstFirst ... 2101112131422 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 374

Thread: Why Not to Vote Democrat

  1. #111
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    27,780
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan View Post
    I know that majority rule is quite popular with people who consider the US a Democracy rather than a Republic, mostly because they believe that a slight majority of citizens should be able to control the slight minority.

    Constitutions, whether state or federal are the basis for all laws in their respective jurisdictions and should be preserved from the "tyranny of the majority" which our nation's founders (and common sense) warned us against. Or, at least make it hard enough to change to prevent people such as your "hater" neighbor and others like him to use it to your disadvantage or, conversely, for you to use it against him.

    I recently saw a poll which revealed that somewhere near 50% of millennials believe citizens should be jailed for "mis-gendering" others. Throw into the mix some percentage of culture warriors of other generations and their dream could be realized in many states. Do you really want that?
    https://www.them.us/story/canadian-c...ghts-violation

    Millennials probably think this, because that kinder, gentler nation of Canada has put this into law. Misgender someone and you go to jail.

    thank you for bringing up this topic. I was going to bring up this Canadian case on the thread here about first amendment, free-speech limitations, but I didn’t get around to it. I think there’s an Australian incident or two going on in the same vein.


    Our United States Constitution is unique among western nations in having the First amendment so clearly articulated.

    Even though our Biden government would prefer us to use biologically incorrect terms for humans, our government cannot —yet – compel our speech.

  2. #112
    Senior Member catherine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    15,695
    Well, if Eli Crane can't be prosecuted and jailed for calling African Americans "colored people" I don't think that people who intentionally or inadvertently mis-gender people should be prosecuted and jailed.
    "Do any human beings ever realize life while they live it--every, every minute?" Emily Webb, Our Town
    www.silententry.wordpress.com

  3. #113
    Simpleton Alan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    9,836
    Quote Originally Posted by catherine View Post
    Well, if Eli Crane can't be prosecuted and jailed for calling African Americans "colored people" I don't think that people who intentionally or inadvertently mis-gender people should be prosecuted and jailed.
    Do you think whoever Eli Crane is should be prosecuted and go to jail for using the term "colored people"? If so, would that also apply to the omnipresent usage of the term "people of color"?
    "Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein

  4. #114
    Senior Member bae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Offshore
    Posts
    11,969
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan View Post
    I recently saw a poll which revealed that somewhere near 50% of millennials believe citizens should be jailed for "mis-gendering" others. Throw into the mix some percentage of culture warriors of other generations and their dream could be realized in many states. Do you really want that?
    Jail, for speech?!?!

    Umm, well, good luck with that.

  5. #115
    Senior Member catherine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    15,695
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan View Post
    Do you think whoever Eli Crane is should be prosecuted and go to jail for using the term "colored people"? If so, would that also apply to the omnipresent usage of the term "people of color"?
    Legally, no I don't.

    Linguistically/culturally, there is a huge difference between referring to people as "colored people" vs "people of color" even though that nuance may seem slim to some..
    "Do any human beings ever realize life while they live it--every, every minute?" Emily Webb, Our Town
    www.silententry.wordpress.com

  6. #116
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,936
    Jail, for speech?!?!
    Just another fear-mongering tactic to keep people from articulating their legislative ideas when the current plutocrats refuse to actually consider any legislation that does not further their consolidation of power. The Ohio constitution has functioned as intended for 110 years, but now the powers that be see a chance to solidify their power base even further, so they're going for it.

  7. #117
    Senior Member bae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Offshore
    Posts
    11,969
    Quote Originally Posted by early morning View Post
    The Ohio constitution has functioned as intended for 110 years, but now the powers that be see a chance to solidify their power base even further, so they're going for it.
    I believe it requires 75% of the US States to vote "aye" to ratify any amendments to the US Constitution?

    And on a more local level, my HOA requires a super-majority to change any of our controlling documents.

    And my State requires a super-majority in our legislature to approve any tax increases.

    I'm not convinced that a simple majority is the correct solution to everything...

  8. #118
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    27,780
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan View Post
    Do you think whoever Eli Crane is should be prosecuted and go to jail for using the term "colored people"? If so, would that also apply to the omnipresent usage of the term "people of color"?
    Shoot, should librarians be fined if they have books in their collections that use the term “ Negro?”

    I once received a book challenge in my public library from someone who objected to a standard text decades-old that used the word “Negro” in the title. I did not remove this book from the collection.

  9. #119
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    27,780
    More realistically and easier to address, a staff member once called me about the word “Nixxer” in our library’s catalog. It was in a catalog record that correctly referred to Agatha Christie’s book “10 Little Indians “as it was an edition note that told the original title “10 little Nixxers.” The book was later published under an even more sanitized title “And then there were none. “

    Since that edition note using offensive language wasn’t really necessary to have in a catalog record, I deleted it and made the staff member happy. But my action did delete a fact. In this case, feelings over facts. Sigh.
    Last edited by iris lilies; 7-17-23 at 6:40pm.

  10. #120
    Senior Member iris lilies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Always logged in
    Posts
    27,780
    Quote Originally Posted by catherine View Post
    Legally, no I don't.

    Linguistically/culturally, there is a huge difference between referring to people as "colored people" vs "people of color" even though that nuance may seem slim to some..
    the Biden White House would have to set up a tribunal like the Canadians with definitions of what is correct speak and what isn’t.

    Oh, I would really look forward to that bullshit. Not.

    I could only hope it would be tossed out like the Ministry of Truth or whatever that ridiculous thing was called.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •