Why NOT to vote Republican

[littlebittybobby]

Okay,okay,okay,okayy---I can answer that. See---AL and Faux are not Conservative enough to really count as REAL Republicans Nope. Consuming large cuts of meat and tanks of motor fuel don't make you conservative, like mee No, not hardly. So, yeah--hiding g behind a platform with the corresponding label is fake. Hope that helps you kids some. Thankk me.

[iris lilies]

because you completely don't express that you have a problem with it? Seriously? But whatever. Simultaneously pretend that you have a problem with that while also never EVER mentioning that you have a problem with it…..

You are funny. If I carried that same logic to you, I could say “ because you completely don’t express that you have a problem with beheading Jewish babies” you must be ok with it because you “never EVER mention that you have a problem with it.”

But see, I do not make that argument because it is silly.

It would be nice if you would stop ascribing opinions to me that I do not have.

[Rogar]

Out of curiosity, can you name one opinion I've expressed that's "wrong in your eye"? I'm asking because I generally stick with providing another outlook on something rather than offer opinions so I'm a little bit curious on where I went further than that.

How far back is relevant and do I recall your a human cause climate change denier and and some opinions with charts indicating we could be coming into a global ice age? Maybe that's just my imagination? The labeling of the left as fascists as in post #200 of trans days, you general vies on abortion, more recently, post #148 under "a Palestinian State", post #131 under thwarts to intellectual freedom. That's about as far back as I cared to look and I probably missed some. My thinking is somewhat inline with JP! who has offered a number of rebuttals, but could practice on his polite discussion manners.

[Alan]

How far back is relevant and do I recall your a human cause climate change denier and and some opinions with charts indicating we could be coming into a global ice age? Maybe that's just my imagination? The labeling of the left as fascists as in post #200 of trans days, you general vies on abortion, more recently, post #148 under "a Palestinian State", post #131 under thwarts to intellectual freedom. That's about as far back as I cared to look and I probably missed some. My thinking is somewhat inline with JP! who has offered a number of rebuttals, but could practice on his polite discussion manners.

Thank you, I'll take a look at those later and consider how to discuss those issues without offending anyone.

[Rogar]

Thank you, I'll take a look at those later and consider how to discuss those issues without offending anyone.

You don't offend me. We just disagree on some things. I generally find your views entertaining or interesting, and fairly moderate compared to some folks I know from Iowa or Missouri and a few from around here.

I think it's good to hear why and what others think and occasionally drop by Breitbart News comments or listen to Hannity (as much as I can stand). Now there's some offense people!

[littlebittybobby]

Okay---If elected, I will solve the homeless problem, by sending them to Ellesmere Island, to c o ntinue their lifestyle. Since global warming is taking place, it might stay above zero and the man-eating polar bears may flee. Yup.

[LDAHL]

You are funny. If I carried that same logic to you, I could say “ because you completely don’t express that you have a problem with beheading Jewish babies” you must be ok with it because you “never EVER mention that you have a problem with it.”

But see, I do not make that argument because it is silly.

It would be nice if you would stop ascribing opinions to me that I do not have.

I always thought the “silence is complicity” formulation was silly. Sort of like the “words are violence” thing.

[jp1]

You are funny. If I carried that same logic to you, I could say “ because you completely don’t express that you have a problem with beheading Jewish babies” you must be ok with it because you “never EVER mention that you have a problem with it.”

But see, I do not make that argument because it is silly.

It would be nice if you would stop ascribing opinions to me that I do not have.

Who the **** is suggesting that anyone should be beheading Jewish babies? Talk about presenting a damn strawman to try and make a point.

[jp1]

I always thought the “silence is complicity” formulation was silly. Sort of like the “words are violence” thing.

A lot of people who witnessed (or have since learned about it if they weren't alive yet) what happened in Germany during the 30s/40s would probably disagree with you.

[jp1]

You are funny. If I carried that same logic to you, I could say “ because you completely don’t express that you have a problem with beheading Jewish babies” you must be ok with it because you “never EVER mention that you have a problem with it.”

But see, I do not make that argument because it is silly.

It would be nice if you would stop ascribing opinions to me that I do not have.

And for the record, even though it's not a thing, at least as far as I know since we've never discussed it here and I've not seen a news article about it, I'm absolutely against the idea of beheading Jewish babies. I want to make that clear just in case it is actually a thing, now that you've brought it up. There. Now that we've gotten that out of the way will you unequivocally state that you do not think trump is at all suitable to be reelected to the presidency given what we know about his past presidency, his attempt to overthrow the government, and his terrify statements about what a second trump administration would look like? Or are you going to remain silent like so many Germans back in the 30s/40s? And then whine and complain that I'm ascribing opinions to you that you don't hold.