Quote Originally Posted by bUU View Post
That's different from saying, though, that the other side's position is definitively indecent, antisocial, and/or regressive. .
I don't see that it is. Either statement requires the same unfounded assumption of moral superiority. A flippant OP gets a flippant response, and it must be because the respondor is coming from a position of "reactionary preference" against what is clearly the "moral assertion". Being shocked and offended that someone would hold opposing views does not seem to me to be an adequate defense of the ethical high ground.