Quote Originally Posted by The Storyteller View Post
And it also says...

"Unskewed, the data indicates that Mitt Romney would lead 52 percent to 46 percent using more balanced weighting of the sample."

So based on the results, was it skewed? Or not?

And here is the page for the author of that article...

http://www.examiner.com/conservative.../dean-chambers

You really shouldn't let yourself be taken in by these people, Alan.
I'll admit that the oversampling involved seems to achieve the desired result, without being at all accurate. In retrospect, I'm not sure how anyone could conduct a poll with weighting several points over actual turnout in 2008 and be considered accurate. Actual voter turnout proves that they weren't.

The thing I'm at a loss to explain is voter enthusiasm levels. It surprises me to see that Republican turnout was lower than expected and that Democratic turnout was higher. These are not facts which could have been anticipated in the months leading up to the election.

Regardless, enjoy your gloat while you can. Remember a stopped clock is correct twice a day.