Well Alan, since you are clueless, I'll talk real slow for ya. Taxing someone who has to actually work for their income more than taxing someone who just sits back and lets it roll in (dividends) is not fair. If both examples, like the golfer and Mitt in the OP example, both make 1,000,000, why should the golfer have to pay a higher tax rate than Mitt, who doesn't have to swing a club, or shovel, or 'hash' to 'earn' his income?

Talking about 'double taxation' is a diversion. If they are taxed 'double' on the same dollar, then they are also profiting double on the same dollar. No one is filtering their money through a corporation just so they can pay MORE on tax. They do it to pay less, per Romney.... The end result is the story. Romney paid 13% tax on his income, only after he fiddled it to pay a higher rate, as it turns out, and the golfer paid more. Much more. I'm pretty sure if Romney were to release the past 10 years of tax returns we would see just how little he actually pays, (which, of course, is why he refused to release those forms)

The American people see through this BS, which is why Romney lost....but keep talking. Keep the 'faux outrage' going, here and on Fox/Limbaugh. I kind of like the democrats having the White House. All we really need to do now is stop the dishonest gerrymandering of districts and voter suppression (now they want to tinker with the electoral college). Desperate people doing desperate things!
Why it never occurs to the right to just craft an agenda that actually serves the people is beyond me...but hey, keep it up republicans.