Not hyperbolic in the slightest.Originally Posted by Alan
Not hyperbolic in the slightest.
No, actually not. One party has been the driving force for all recent challenges to constitutionally protected liberties.
"Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein
Which party was into this stuff from 2000 to 2008?
The same.
"Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein
Oooookay.
Twenty-five days left and this morning I still hadn't decided who to vote for. To be honest I haven't been thinking about it much. For some reason, hearing even the mention of EITHER candidate causes Parkinson's like symptoms. My eyes cross, I spill coffee all over myself as my right hand begins to tremor, under the stress.......I swallow my spit and cough uncontrollably. I grab my wife's private parts and make rude comments about her anatomy. In April, I filed for a tax extension and forgot all about it until now .........now I am thinking about filing for bankruptcy and I am financially sound!
So this morning I was determined to make a decision. After all, I'm getting sick of destroying all the campaign ad mailings for Hillary that have come in the mail. Just don't want the wife making rash decisions on propaganda before she talks to me about who to vote for. Well, certainly not the Hildabeast. And as much as I want to believe Donald can hold it together for four years and make us a Very Very Great Nation Again......well he is a gazillionaire and a really really bad one at that. The way I look at it, he became rich despite himself.
Well, there's the Libertarian Gary Johnson. Gary knows a lot about New Mexico.....maybe too much because he knows nothing of the rest of the world.
Okay, how about Jill Stein and the Greens. A leftist secular Jew who graduated from Harvard. Nothing snobbier than a Harvard grad. Not much in common with the son of a mill worker who cheated his way through state college. I care about the earth and all but I'm not militaristic about climate change. And I'd like the military to at least be able to defend us from attack.
Now here's a guy to get excited about.....Constitutional Party Darell Castle. Whoa! He is a personal injury attorney....next!
Ah. The Independent Party Candidate... Evan McMullin. I'm Independent. He's even got an attractive running mate. Mindy. Geez, all I can think of is Mork and Mindy now. For a guy who claims the country is hungry for new ideas.....he sure does have a lot of tired old ones. Think I'll pass.
Lets see, Social, Reform, Socialist Workers Party, Approval, Revoluntionary, Prohibition, Americas, Pacifist, Nutrition Party..... LEGAL MARIJUANA NOW PARTY - Dan Vacek.
Party Slogan- Free the Weed and Free the People!
Thats It. Now I don't even have to watch the third debate.
Your ballot sounds much more fun than mine. Other than the four biggies for president all we have is Gloria Estella La Riva and Dennis J. Banks of the "Peace and Freedom" party.
I do, however, probably have more ballot initiatives to distract me from the presidential insanity than you do. Between the city and state the two voter guides total 554 pages of what will undoubtedly be delightful, page turning reading! I can just imagine my Amazon reviews. "Couldn't put it down! ... Had to find out how the story ended."
Hummmm....perhaps you can find time to go over this with the little woman while you are tying her shoes...
554 pages!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just knew it was CA. We had two poorly written and explained initiatives(?). One was for a change to our state constitution. I could not understand how it was written so NO. The other was for a questionable tax increase again No. If they could write better or explain it better in earlier publications, maybe.
I am thankful that we have already voted.
In Wisconsin they have a web site where you can enter your address and see the ballot. We have a Workers World Party and an American Delta Party candidate, along with the usual suspects. I'll probably just write in Evan McMullin. We have a pool going on turnout in our county. One camp says it will be very low due to general voter disgust. The other says it will be very high due to the desire to offset a seemingly inevitable Clinton victory with down-ballot victories (we're a very Republican county that went heavily for Cruz in the primary).
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote