That's the thing about dog whistles. They contain enough plausible deniability that someone can come here and either with a straight face or feigning a straight face deny the racism and all I can do is be baffled at how it was missed because it's entirely possible that the straight face is legitimate.
For me, the part that turned it into dog whistle was the point that western civilization and christianity were called out to be noted as specifically better than everything else.
I consider actions to be a more reliable and simpler benchmark for practical purposes. For instance, I think it easier to treat something as a crime based on the act committed rather than the motivation. Murder is murder, and labeling it as a "hate crime" doesn't add or detract anything from it's impact. Punishing people for "wrong thinking", as with certain university speech codes for instance, strikes me as a shortcut to tyranny (even if it's a well-intentioned, sensitive tyranny).
After night one of the RNC I heard a pundit call the GOP "the party of lost causes."
In many ways, this seems like a near perfect descriptor, does it not?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)