No, they're just a lot more vocal. Most of them have been here a long time and are so far to the left that the Democratic party is just now catching up to them.Originally Posted by AlaskanGuy
No, they're just a lot more vocal. Most of them have been here a long time and are so far to the left that the Democratic party is just now catching up to them.
"Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein
Is there such a thing as a moderate anymore? I fall into the democrat crowd for many things and especially climate change, but am a gun owner, mostly for hunting, and can be in the conservative side for some issues. I think republicans have gone further right and democrats further left in more recent times. At least the tea party seems to be going away. It's easy to get caught up in tribal mentality.
Hopefully any liberal leanings won't dissuade you. It's good to hear how others think even if we don't all agree.
Amen Rogar!!!
I believe most people like to think of themselves as reasonable moderates. But they define “moderate” in some radically different ways. What is the moderate position on health care? Or globalization? Or gun control?
I hear Elizabeth Warren is catching up with Joe Biden in the polls. That should please the dirigisme fans in the audience.
I've always loved that song:
Play your didgeridoo, Blue
Play your didgeridoo
Ah, like, keep playin' 'til I shoot through, Blue
Play your didgeridoo
Altogether now!
Wait, I think that word doesn't mean what I thought it means.
"Things should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler." ~ Albert Einstein
I, as usual, will vote for the Communist candidate.
Mostly because I'd feel best about cleaning up that mess :-)
I see Hickenlooper is out, reasonableness being the narrow niche market that it is.
The reasonableness of drinking fracking fluid. Whatever else, might just be good instincts, but noone wanted to go near that guy at least.
Trees don't grow on money
You mean the reasonableness that someone with less than 1% of voters picking him meaning that he had 0% chance of winning and should therefore choose a more realistic goal?
Even though he has previously said he wasn't interested, maybe running for senate is a better plan for him. Who knows.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote